Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35322451›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical periodontology2022

Molecular biomarker research in periodontology: A roadmap for translation of science to clinical assay validation.

Ulvi Kahraman Gürsoy, Alpdogan Kantarci

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical periodontology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ulvi Kahraman GürsoyDepartment of Periodontology, Institute of Dentistry, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-1225-5751
Alpdogan KantarciThe Forsyth Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2679-9100
Harvard University · USUniversity of Turku · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The number of studies that aims to apply host- or microbe-derived biochemical biomarkers to periodontal disease diagnosis has increased significantly during the last three decades. The biochemical markers can reflect the presence, severity, and activity of periodontal diseases; however, heterogeneities in applied laboratory methods, data presentation, statistical analysis, and data interpretation prevent the translation of candidate host- or microbe-derived biochemical biomarkers to clinical assay validation. Here, we propose a roadmap for making the research outcomes comparable and re-analysable with the ultimate goal of translating research to clinical practice. This roadmap presents reporting recommendations for host- or microbe-derived biochemical biomarker studies in periodontology. We aim to make essential elements of the research work (including diagnostic criteria, clinical endpoint definitions, participant recruitment criteria, sample collection and storage techniques, biochemical and microbiological detection methods, and applied statistical analysis) visible and comparable.

Indexed as

GingivitisPeriodontal DiseasesBiomarkersGingival Crevicular FluidHumansPeriodonticsResearch DesignBiomarkersgingival crevicular fluidgingivitisperiodontal diseasesperiodontitissaliva

Identifiers

PMID35322451
PMCPMC9321848
OpenAlexW4220933406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.