Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35322305›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2022

Flattening the quality of life curve? A prospective person-centred study from Norway amid COVID-19.

Ragnhild Bang Nes, Baeksan Yu, Thomas Hansen, Øystein Vedaa, Espen Røysamb, Thomas S Nilsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ragnhild Bang NesDepartment of Mental Health and Suicide, The Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway. raba@fhi.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7828-7863
Baeksan YuDepartment of Mental Health and Suicide, The Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Thomas HansenDepartment of Mental Health and Suicide, The Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Øystein VedaaDepartment of Health Promotion, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Bergen, Norway.
Espen RøysambPromenta Research Centre, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Thomas S NilsenDepartment of Mental Health and Suicide, The Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

Norges Forskningsråd 288083
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe examined multidimensional, heterogeneous reactions to the COVID-19 pandemic and associated measures to provide further insights into the developmental processes of risk and adaptation.

methodWe used three-wave questionnaire data from 8156 individuals participating in the Norwegian County Public Health Survey assessed 1-5 months before and three (June 2020) and nine (December 2020) months after the outbreak. Latent profile and latent transition analyses were used to identify latent quality of life (QoL) classes and multiform changes, their probabilities, and predictors.

resultsWe identified five distinct QoL classes of varying proportions, namely Flourishing (i.e. 24-40%), Content (31-46%), Content-Symptomatic (8-10%), Languishing (14-20%), and Troubled (2-5%). Despite higher levels of negative affect and lower levels of life satisfaction and positive emotions, most individuals remained in their pre-pandemic QoL profiles. Yet, changes occurred for a meaningful proportion, with transition to a less favourable class more common than to a favourable. Between time 1 and 3, the flourishing and troubled groups decreased by 40% and 60%, while the content and languishing groups increased by 48% and 43%, respectively. Favourable pre-pandemic relational (marital status, support, interpersonal trust, and belonging), health, and economy-related status predicted significantly lower odds of belonging to the high-risk groups both pre-pandemic and during the pandemic.

conclusionsOverall, this study shows lower levels of QoL amid the COVID-19 pandemic, but substantial stability in the QoL distribution, and an overall levelling of the QoL distribution. Our findings also underscore the importance of financial, health-related, and social capital to QoL.

Indexed as

COVID-19Quality of LifeHumansPandemicsProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesAnxietyCOVID-19DepressionLatent transition analysisQuality of lifeSubjective wellbeing

Identifiers

PMID35322305
PMCPMC8942803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.