ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2022
Does increasing estrogen dose during frozen embryo transfer affect pregnancy rate?
Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Live birth after oocyte donation in women with Turner syndrome compared with other causes of premature ovarian insufficiency: a retrospective cohort study.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Article
- Effect of progesterone timing on live birth rates in day-6 blastocyst frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles: a randomized controlled trial.Human reproduction open · 2026Article
- Preparation of the endometrium for frozen embryo transfer: an update on clinical practices.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the effect of increasing estrogen doses during hormone therapy frozen embryo transfer (HT-FET) cycles on endometrial thickness and success rates compared to patients who received fixed estrogen dose. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective study from a university-based fertility clinic during the years 2008-2021. We compared two groups: the fixed-dose group (i.e., received 6 mg estradiol dose daily until embryo transfer) and the increased-dose group (i.e., the initial estradiol dose was 6 mg daily, and was increased during the cycle). PRIMARY OUTCOME: clinical pregnancy rate.
resultsThe study included 5452 cycles of HT-FET: 4774 cycles in the fixed-dose group and 678 cycles in the increased-dose group. Ultrasound scan on days 2-3 of the cycle showed endometrial thickness slightly different between the two groups (4.2 mm in the fixed-dose and 4.0 mm in the increased-dose group, P = 0.003). The total estrogen dose was higher, and the treatment duration was longer in the increased than the fixed-dose group (122 mg vs. 66 mg and 17 days vs. 11 days, respectively; P < 0.001). The last ultrasound scan done before the addition of progesterone showed that the endometrial thickness was significantly thicker in the fixed than the increased-dose group (9.5 mm vs. 8.3 mm; P < 0.001). The clinical pregnancy rates were 35.8% in the increased-group vs. 34.1% in the fixed-dose group; P = 0.401.
conclusionsThe increased-dose group had thinner endometrium despite the higher doses of estrogen and longer treatment duration than the fixed-dose group. However, the pregnancy rates were similar between the two groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.