Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35322275›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2022

Psychological State and Decision Perceptions of Male and Female Cancer Patients on Fertility Preservation.

Minxin Chen, Yin Zhang, Feng Zhang, Feng Jiang, Xiao Wang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Barriers to and Facilitators of Shared Decision-Making Implementation in Fertility Preservation for Patients With Cancer: A Qualitative Study.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Minxin ChenObstetrics & Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, 200011, China.
Yin ZhangObstetrics & Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, 200011, China.
Feng ZhangObstetrics & Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, 200011, China.
Feng JiangShanghai JIAI Genetics & IVF Institute China-USA Center, Shanghai, 200011, China.
Xiao WangObstetrics & Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, 200011, China. wxkimi@hotmail.com.
Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University · CNShangHai JiAi Genetics & IVF Institute · CN

Funding

Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project No.2017SHZDZX01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study explored the emotional state and decision perceptions of fertility preservation (FP) decisions of male and female cancer patients undergoing FP.

settingObstetrics & Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University.

methodAll patients with a cancer diagnosis were referred by their physician to contact a fertility preservation specialist for FP plan discussion. After FP counseling, participants completed sociodemographic and basic information surveys and validated psychological and decisional scales.

resultsThe final sample included 17 male and 16 female cancer FP patients. Overall, 85% of participants reported currently undergoing moderate to severe depression and anxiety states. Sex differences were found in both depression and anxiety states (P < 0.05). Both genders demonstrated a low level of regret in the decision to preserve fertility, indicating that participants felt they had made the right decision. However, there displayed decisional conflict, suggesting that cancer patients felt high conflict when making decisions.

conclusionIn conclusion, there is a nonnegligible emotional burden on FP patients who have already undergone a painful situation before the start of oncological treatment. This is the first study to use validated DRS to examine emotional problems occurring in both men and women during FP decision-making.

Indexed as

Fertility PreservationNeoplasmsCounselingDecision MakingFemaleHumansMaleMedical OncologyPregnancyAnxietyCancerDecision perceptionsDepressionFertility preservationPsychology state

Identifiers

PMID35322275
OpenAlexW4220951646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.