Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35322206›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2022

Megapixel camera arrays enable high-resolution animal tracking in multiwell plates.

Ida L Barlow, Luigi Feriani, Eleni Minga, Adam McDermott-Rouse, Thomas James O'Brien, Ziwei Liu, Maximilian Hofbauer, John R Stowers, Erik C Andersen, Siyu Serena Ding and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. ThebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Natural variation suggests candidate genes underlying Caenorhabditis elegans susceptibility to diverse toxicants.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. High-Throughput Toxicity Screening withEnvironmental science & technology · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Natural variation suggests candidate genes underlyingbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. eNeuro · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Ida L Barlow *Institute of Clinical Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Luigi Feriani *Institute of Clinical Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Eleni MingaInstitute of Clinical Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Adam McDermott-RouseInstitute of Clinical Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Thomas James O'BrienInstitute of Clinical Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5529-331X
Ziwei LiuInstitute of Clinical Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Maximilian HofbauerLoopbio GmbH, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7954-2261
John R StowersLoopbio GmbH, Vienna, Austria.
Erik C AndersenDepartment of Molecular Biosciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0229-9651
Siyu Serena DingInstitute of Clinical Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.
André E X BrownInstitute of Clinical Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK. andre.brown@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1324-8764
MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences · GBImperial College London · GBKarolinska Institutet · SEMax Planck Institute of Animal Behavior · DENIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre · GBNorthwestern University · US

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilMedical Research Council MC-A658-5TY30Medical Research Council MC_UP_1102/6
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tracking small laboratory animals such as flies, fish, and worms is used for phenotyping in neuroscience, genetics, disease modelling, and drug discovery. An imaging system with sufficient throughput and spatiotemporal resolution would be capable of imaging a large number of animals, estimating their pose, and quantifying detailed behavioural differences at a scale where hundreds of treatments could be tested simultaneously. Here we report an array of six 12-megapixel cameras that record all the wells of a 96-well plate with sufficient resolution to estimate the pose of C. elegans worms and to extract high-dimensional phenotypic fingerprints. We use the system to study behavioural variability across wild isolates, the sensitisation of worms to repeated blue light stimulation, the phenotypes of worm disease models, and worms' behavioural responses to drug treatment. Because the system is compatible with standard multiwell plates, it makes computational ethological approaches accessible in existing high-throughput pipelines.

Indexed as

Caenorhabditis elegansLightAnimalsPhenotype

Identifiers

PMID35322206
PMCPMC8943053
OpenAlexW4220806894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.