Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35322150›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Disruption of anthrax toxin receptor 1 in pigs leads to a rare disease phenotype and protection from senecavirus A infection.

Paula R Chen, Raymond R R Rowland, Ana M Stoian, Vlad Petrovan, Maureen Sheahan, Charan Ganta, Giselle Cino-Ozuna, Dae Young Kim, James M Dunleavey, Kristin M Whitworth and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Pig Genome Editing for Agriculture: Achievements and Challenges.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Gene editing of pigs to control influenza A virus infections.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Paula R ChenDivision of Animal Science, College of Agriculture Food and Natural Resources, University of Missouri, Columbia, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA. Prcn78@missouri.edu.
Raymond R R RowlandDepartment of Diagnostic Medicine and Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, 66506, USA.
Ana M StoianDepartment of Diagnostic Medicine and Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, 66506, USA.
Vlad PetrovanDepartment of Diagnostic Medicine and Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, 66506, USA.
Maureen SheahanDepartment of Diagnostic Medicine and Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, 66506, USA.
Charan GantaCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, 66506, USA.
Giselle Cino-OzunaCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, 66506, USA.
Dae Young KimVeterinary Medical Diagnostic Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA.
James M DunleaveyMouse Cancer Genetics Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD, 21702, USA.
Kristin M WhitworthDivision of Animal Science, College of Agriculture Food and Natural Resources, University of Missouri, Columbia, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA.
Melissa S SamuelDivision of Animal Science, College of Agriculture Food and Natural Resources, University of Missouri, Columbia, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA.
Lee D SpateDivision of Animal Science, College of Agriculture Food and Natural Resources, University of Missouri, Columbia, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA.
Raissa F CecilDivision of Animal Science, College of Agriculture Food and Natural Resources, University of Missouri, Columbia, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA.
Joshua A BenneDivision of Animal Science, College of Agriculture Food and Natural Resources, University of Missouri, Columbia, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA.
Xingyu YanDepartment of Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, 61802, USA.
Ying FangDepartment of Diagnostic Medicine and Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, 66506, USA.
Brad St CroixMouse Cancer Genetics Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD, 21702, USA.
Kelly LechtenbergMidwest Veterinary Services, Inc. and Central States Research Centre, Inc., Oakland, NE, 68045, USA.
Kevin D WellsDivision of Animal Science, College of Agriculture Food and Natural Resources, University of Missouri, Columbia, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA.
Randall S PratherDivision of Animal Science, College of Agriculture Food and Natural Resources, University of Missouri, Columbia, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA.
University of Missouri · USKansas State University · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USCancer Genetics (United States) · USCenter for Cancer Research · US

Funding

Functional Analysis of TEM5 and TEM8ZIABC010484 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI ST CROIX, BRADLEY D · 2009 to 2025
$9.3M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Senecavirus A (SVA) is a cause of vesicular disease in pigs, and infection rates are rising within the swine industry. Recently, anthrax toxin receptor 1 (ANTXR1) was revealed as the receptor for SVA in human cells. Herein, the role of ANTXR1 as a receptor for SVA in pigs was investigated by CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing. Strikingly, ANTXR1 knockout (KO) pigs exhibited features consistent with the rare disease, GAPO syndrome, in humans. Fibroblasts from wild type (WT) pigs supported replication of SVA; whereas, fibroblasts from KO pigs were resistant to infection. During an SVA challenge, clinical symptoms, including vesicular lesions, and circulating viremia were present in infected WT pigs but were absent in KO pigs. Additional ANTXR1-edited piglets were generated that were homozygous for an in-frame (IF) mutation. While IF pigs presented a GAPO phenotype similar to the KO pigs, fibroblasts showed mild infection, and circulating SVA nucleic acid was decreased in IF compared to WT pigs. Thus, this new ANTXR1 mutation resulted in decreased permissiveness of SVA in pigs. Overall, genetic disruption of ANTXR1 in pigs provides a unique model for GAPO syndrome and prevents circulating SVA infection and clinical symptoms, confirming that ANTXR1 acts as a receptor for the virus.

Indexed as

PicornaviridaePicornaviridae InfectionsSwine DiseasesAlopeciaAnimalsAnodontiaGrowth DisordersOptic Atrophies, HereditaryPhenotypeRare DiseasesReceptors, PeptideSwineanthrax toxin receptorsReceptors, Peptide

Identifiers

PMID35322150
PMCPMC8943192
OpenAlexW4220673613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.