Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35322134›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2022

Electrocautery smoke exposure and efficacy of smoke evacuation systems in minimally invasive and open surgery: a prospective randomized study.

Gregor J Kocher, Abigail R Koss, Michael Groessl, Joerg C Schefold, Markus M Luedi, Christopher Quapp, Patrick Dorn, Jon Lutz, Luca Cappellin, Manuel Hutterli and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03924206 (Hazardous Surgical Smoke), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03924206 completednot on this map

Hazardous Surgical Smoke: Risk Assessment and Evaluation of a New Smoke Extractor System (SES) in the Surgical Unit

TypeobservationalSponsorInsel Gruppe AG, University Hospital BernRan2019 to 2019Enrolled142ConditionsLung Cancer, Lung InjuryArmsSmoke evacuation system
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Surgical smoke and its components, effects, and mitigation: a contemporary review.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Gregor J KocherDivision of General Thoracic Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010, Bern, Switzerland. gregor.kocher@hin.ch.
Abigail R KossTofwerk AG, Thun, Switzerland.
Michael GroesslDepartment of Nephrology and Hypertension and Department of BioMedical Research, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Joerg C SchefoldDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Markus M LuediDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Christopher QuappDivision of General Thoracic Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
Patrick DornDivision of General Thoracic Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
Jon LutzDivision of General Thoracic Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
Luca CappellinTofwerk AG, Thun, Switzerland.
Manuel HutterliTofwerk AG, Thun, Switzerland.
Felipe D Lopez-HilfikerTofwerk AG, Thun, Switzerland.
Mohammad Al-HuraniDivision of General Thoracic Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
Sergio B SesiaDivision of General Thoracic Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Worldwide, health care professionals working in operating rooms (ORs) are exposed to electrocautery smoke on a daily basis. Aims of this study were to determine composition and concentrations of electrocautery smoke in the OR using mass spectrometry. Prospective observational study at a tertiary care academic center, involving 122 surgical procedures of which 84 were 1:1 computer randomized to smoke evacuation system (SES) versus no SES use. Irritating, toxic, carcinogenic and mutagenic VOCs were observed in OR air, with some exceeding permissible exposure limits (OSHA/NIOSH). Mean total concentration of harmful compounds was 272.69 ppb (± 189 ppb) with a maximum total concentration of harmful substances of 8991 ppb (at surgeon level, no SES). Maximum total VOC concentrations were 1.6 ± 1.2 ppm (minimally-invasive surgery) and 2.1 ± 1.5 ppm (open surgery), and total maximum VOC concentrations were 1.8 ± 1.3 ppm at the OR table 'at surgeon level' and 1.4 ± 1.0 ppm 'in OR room air' away from the operating table. Neither difference was statistically significant. In open surgery, SES significantly reduced maximum concentrations of specific VOCs at surgeon level, including aromatics and aldehydes. Our data indicate relevant exposure of health care professionals to volatile organic compounds in the OR. Surgical technique and distance to cautery devices did not significantly reduce exposure. SES reduced exposure to specific harmful VOC's during open surgery.Trial Registration Number: NCT03924206 (clinicaltrials.gov).

Indexed as

Occupational ExposureVolatile Organic CompoundsCarcinogensElectrocoagulationHumansOperating RoomsProspective StudiesCarcinogensVolatile Organic Compounds

Identifiers

PMID35322134
PMCPMC8943181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.