Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35322125›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

A four specimen-pooling scheme reliably detects SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses using the BioFire FilmArray Respiratory Panel 2.1.

Charlene Ranadheera, Greg J German, Laura Steven, Dale Eung, Dmytro Lyubashenko, Jessica C Pepin, Marko Zivcec, Kym Antonation, Cindi R Corbett

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Back to the future of viruses: a case of triple coinfection caused by respiratory syncytial virus, human coronavirus OC43, and rhinovirus.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Charlene RanadheeraHealth Security and Response Division, National Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, MB, Canada. Charlene.ranadheera@phac-aspc.gc.ca.
Greg J GermanQueen Elizabeth Hospital, Charlottetown, PE, Canada.
Laura StevenStanton Territorial Hospital, Yellowknife, NT, Canada.
Dale EungHealth Security and Response Division, National Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Dmytro LyubashenkoHealth Security and Response Division, National Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Jessica C PepinHealth Security and Response Division, National Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Marko ZivcecHealth Security and Response Division, National Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Kym AntonationHealth Security and Response Division, National Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Cindi R CorbettHealth Security and Response Division, National Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Public Health Agency of Canada · CAUniversity of Manitoba · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic required increased testing capacity, enabling rapid case identification and effective contract tracing to reduce transmission of disease. The BioFire FilmArray is a fully automated nucleic acid amplification test system providing specificity and sensitivity associated with gold standard molecular methods. The FilmArray Respiratory Panel 2.1 targets 22 viral and bacterial pathogens, including SARS-CoV-2 and influenza virus. While each panel provides a robust output of information regarding pathogen detection, the specimen throughput is low. This study evaluates the FilmArray Respiratory Panel 2.1 using 33 pools of contrived nasal samples and 22 pools of clinical nasopharyngeal specimens to determine the feasibility of increasing testing capacity, while maintaining detection of both SARS-CoV-2 and influenza virus. We observed 100% detection and 90% positive agreement for SARS-CoV-2 and 98% detection and 95% positive agreement for influenza viruses with pools of contrived or clinical specimens, respectively. While discordant results were mainly attributed to loss in sensitivity, the sensitivity of the pooling assay was well within accepted limits of detection for a nucleic acid amplification test. Overall, this study provides evidence supporting the use of pooling patient specimens, one in four with the FilmArray Respiratory Panel 2.1 for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza virus.

Indexed as

COVID-19OrthomyxoviridaeRespiratory Tract InfectionsHumansMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesPandemicsSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID35322125
PMCPMC8942994
OpenAlexW4221112036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.