Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35322080›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Impact of virtual embodiment and exercises on functional ability and range of motion in orthopedic rehabilitation.

Marta Matamala-Gomez, Mel Slater, Maria V Sanchez-Vives

Registry-linked trialAbstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05921747 (The Impact of Innovative Technology Strategies on Implementing Exercise Programs Using Fully Immersive Virtual Reality for Postpartum Women), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05921747 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

The Impact of Innovative Technology Strategies on Implementing Exercise Programs Using Fully Immersive Virtual Reality for Postpartum Women

TypeinterventionalSponsorShalamar Institute of Health SciencesRan2023 to 2026Enrolled34ConditionsPost Partum Lumbopelvic PainArmsTraditional exercise as control group, VR Intervention Group Protocol
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marta Matamala-GomezInstitut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Rosselló 149-153, 08036, Barcelona, Spain. marta.matamalagomez@unimib.it.
Mel SlaterEvent-Lab, Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychobiology, Universitat de Barcelona, Passeig de la Vall d'Hebron 171, 08035, Barcelona, Spain.
Maria V Sanchez-VivesInstitut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Rosselló 149-153, 08036, Barcelona, Spain. msanche3@clinic.cat.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent evidence supports the use of immersive virtual reality (immersive VR) as a means of applying visual feedback techniques in neurorehabilitation. In this study, we investigated the benefits of an embodiment-based immersive VR training program for orthopedic upper limb rehabilitation, with the aim of improving the motor functional ability of the arm and accelerating the rehabilitation process in patients with a conservatively managed distal radius fracture. We designed a rehabilitation program based on developing ownership over a virtual arm and then exercising it in immersive VR. We carried out a between 3-group controlled trial with 54 patients (mean age = 61.80 ± 14.18): 20 patients were assigned to the experimental training group (immersive VR), 20 to the conventional digit mobilization (CDM) training control group, and 14 to a non-immersive (non-immersive VR) training control group. We found that functional recovery of the arm in the immersive VR group was correlated with the ownership and agency scores over the virtual arm. We also found larger range of joint movements and lower disability of the fractured arm compared with patients in the Non-immersive VR and CDM groups. Feeling embodied in a virtual body can be used as a rehabilitation tool to speed up and improve motor functional recovery of a fractured arm after the immobilization period.

Indexed as

Musculoskeletal DiseasesVirtual RealityAgedHumansMiddle AgedRange of Motion, ArticularRecovery of FunctionUpper Extremity

Identifiers

PMID35322080
PMCPMC8943096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.