ArticleScientific reports2022
An efficient density peak cluster algorithm for improving policy evaluation performance.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, the XACML (eXtensible Access Control Markup Language) is widely used in a variety of research fields, especially in access control. However, when policy sets defined by the XACML become large and complex, the policy evaluation time increases significantly. In order to improve policy evaluation performance, we propose an optimization algorithm based on the DPCA (Density Peak Cluster Algorithm) to improve the clustering effect on large-scale complex policy sets. Combined with this algorithm, an efficient policy evaluation engine, named DPEngine, is proposed to speed up policy matching and reduce the policy evaluation time. We compare the policy evaluation time of DPEngine with the Sun PDP, HPEngine, XEngine and SBA-XACML. The experiment results show that (1) when the number of requests reaches 10,000, the DPEngine evaluation time on a large-scale policy set with 100,000 rules is approximately 2.23%, 3.47%, 3.67% and 4.06% of that of the Sun PDP, HPEngine, XEngine and SBA-XACML, respectively and (2) as the number of requests increases, the DPEngine evaluation time grows linearly. Compared with other policy evaluation engines, the DPEngine has the advantages of efficiency and stability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.