ArticleScientific reports2022
Collective responses of bacteria to a local source of conflicting effectors.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Repulsion from slow-diffusing nutrients improves microbial chemotaxis towards moving sources.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Collective bacterial condensation is fundamentally constrained by the emergence of active turbulence.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Single-array measurements reveal non-uniform, mosaic-like chemosensory arrays in bacteria.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Article
- Collective condensation and auto-aggregation of Escherichia coli in uniform acidic environments.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Navigating Environmental Transitions: the Role of Phenotypic Variation in Bacterial Responses.mBio · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To cope in complex environments, motile bacteria have developed a chemosensory system that integrates multiple cues and directs their motion toward regions that it deems favorable. However, we have a limited understanding of the principles that govern bacterial behavior in complex stimuli fields. Here, we followed the spatial redistribution of E. coli cells in perplexing environments created by a local source of both beneficial (nutrients) and hazardous (low pH or indole) effectors. We identified two fundamentally distinct collective responses: a 'trade-off' response, in which bacteria sharply accumulated at a distance from the source that reflected a trade-off between the propagating effectors, and a 'bet-hedging' response, in which part of the bacteria accumulated away from the source, avoiding the hazardous effector, while the other part evaded the repulsive force and accumulated at the source. In addition, we demonstrate that cells lacking the Tsr sensor swim toward both repellents and, surprisingly, even toward pH values well below 7. Using a numerical analysis, we could correlate the collective bacterial responses with fundamentally distinct chemotactic force fields created along the channel by the propagation of the effectors and their unique perception by the chemosensory system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.