ArticleScientific reports2022
Automated quality assessment of large digitised histology cohorts by artificial intelligence.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.
- Agentic AI workflows in anatomic pathology: Opportunities and challenges.Journal of pathology informatics · 2026Review
- Whole-slide imaging in hematopathology: Current state, challenges and future opportunities.Journal of pathology informatics · 2026Review
- Article
- Histological aging signatures for monitoring tissue-specific aging and disease.Nature medicine · 2026Article
- GrandQC adaptation as an artificial intelligence tool for quantitative artifact detection in hematoxylin and eosin whole-slide images-Simulation of quality control biopsies day.Journal of pathology informatics · 2026Article
- Deployment of AI-driven automated quality control of whole-slide images in a large tertiary cancer center.Journal of pathology informatics · 2026Article
- Interobserver Variability Across Whole-Slide Imaging Systems.Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine · 2026Article
- Diffusion attention expert model for predicting and semi-automatic localizing STAS in lung cancer histopathological images.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Article
- PathQC: Determining Molecular and Structural Integrity of Tissues from Histopathological Slides.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence-based quantitative bone marrow pathology analysis for myeloproliferative neoplasms.Haematologica · 2025Article
- Evaluating the robustness of slide-level AI predictions on out-of-focus whole slide images: A retrospective observational study.Journal of pathology informatics · 2025Article
- A mixture of experts (MoE) model to improve AI-based computational pathology prediction performance under variable levels of image blur.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- An end-to-end multifunctional AI platform for intraoperative diagnosis.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Proposal for Using AI to Assess Clinical Data Integrity and Generate Metadata: Algorithm Development and Validation.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- A hybrid multi-instance learning-based identification of gastric adenocarcinoma differentiation on whole-slide images.Biomedical engineering online · 2025Article
- Article
- Assessing the quality of whole slide images in cytology from nuclei features.Journal of pathology informatics · 2025Article
- Vision Transformers for Low-Quality Histopathological Images: A Case Study on Squamous Cell Carcinoma Margin Classification.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Research using whole slide images (WSIs) of histopathology slides has increased exponentially over recent years. Glass slides from retrospective cohorts, some with patient follow-up data are digitised for the development and validation of artificial intelligence (AI) tools. Such resources, therefore, become very important, with the need to ensure that their quality is of the standard necessary for downstream AI development. However, manual quality control of large cohorts of WSIs by visual assessment is unfeasible, and whilst quality control AI algorithms exist, these focus on bespoke aspects of image quality, e.g. focus, or use traditional machine-learning methods, which are unable to classify the range of potential image artefacts that should be considered. In this study, we have trained and validated a multi-task deep neural network to automate the process of quality control of a large retrospective cohort of prostate cases from which glass slides have been scanned several years after production, to determine both the usability of the images at the diagnostic level (considered in this study to be the minimal standard for research) and the common image artefacts present. Using a two-layer approach, quality overlays of WSIs were generated from a quality assessment (QA) undertaken at patch-level at [Formula: see text] magnification. From these quality overlays the slide-level quality scores were predicted and then compared to those generated by three specialist urological pathologists, with a Pearson correlation of 0.89 for overall 'usability' (at a diagnostic level), and 0.87 and 0.82 for focus and H&E staining quality scores respectively. To demonstrate its wider potential utility, we subsequently applied our QA pipeline to the TCGA prostate cancer cohort and to a colorectal cancer cohort, for comparison. Our model, designated as PathProfiler, indicates comparable predicted usability of images from the cohorts assessed (86-90% of WSIs predicted to be usable), and perhaps more significantly is able to predict WSIs that could benefit from an intervention such as re-scanning or re-staining for quality improvement. We have shown in this study that AI can be used to automate the process of quality control of large retrospective WSI cohorts to maximise their utility for research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.