Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35322053›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

The gut microbiome of exudivorous marmosets in the wild and captivity.

Joanna Malukiewicz, Reed A Cartwright, Jorge A Dergam, Claudia S Igayara, Sharon E Kessler, Silvia B Moreira, Leanne T Nash, Patricia A Nicola, Luiz C M Pereira, Alcides Pissinatti and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Association of Primate Veterinarians Guidelines for the Management of Diarrhea.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 10 institutions in 4 countries.

Joanna MalukiewiczPrimate Genetics Laboratory, German Primate Center, Leibniz Institute for Primate Research, Goettingen, 37077, Germany. jmalukie@gmail.com.
Reed A CartwrightSchool of Life Sciences and The Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85281, USA.
Jorge A DergamDepartamento de Biologia Animal, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, MG, 36570-900, Brazil.
Claudia S IgayaraGuarulhos Municipal Zoo, Guarulhos, SP, 07081-120, Brazil.
Sharon E KesslerDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, Scotland.
Silvia B MoreiraCentro de Primatologia do Rio de Janeiro, Guapimirim, RJ, 25940-000, Brazil.
Leanne T NashSchool of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85281, USA.
Patricia A NicolaPrograma de Pos-Graduacao Ciencias da Saude e Biologicas, Universidade Federal do Vale do Sao Francisco, Petrolina, PE, 56300-000, Brazil.
Luiz C M PereiraCentro de Conservacao e Manejo de Fauna da Caatinga, Universidade Federal do Vale do, Sao Francisco, Petrolina, PE, 56300-000, Brazil.
Alcides PissinattiCentro de Primatologia do Rio de Janeiro, Guapimirim, RJ, 25940-000, Brazil.
Carlos R Ruiz-MirandaLaboratorio das Ciencias Ambientais, Centro de Biociencias e Biotecnologia, Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense, Campos dos Goytacazes, RJ, 28013-602, Brazil.
Andrew T OzgaHalmos College of Arts and Sciences, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL, 33314, USA.
Adriana A QuirinoCentro de Conservacao e Manejo de Fauna da Caatinga, Universidade Federal do Vale do, Sao Francisco, Petrolina, PE, 56300-000, Brazil.
Christian RoosPrimate Genetics Laboratory, German Primate Center, Leibniz Institute for Primate Research, Goettingen, 37077, Germany.
Daniel L SilvaNucleo de Pesquisas em Ciencias Biologicas-NUPEB, Federal University of Ouro Preto, Ouro Preto, MG, 35400-000, Brazil.
Anne C StoneSchool of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85281, USA.
Adriana D GrativolLaboratorio das Ciencias Ambientais, Centro de Biociencias e Biotecnologia, Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense, Campos dos Goytacazes, RJ, 28013-602, Brazil.
Arizona State University · USUniversidade Federal do Vale do São Francisco · BRState University of Norte Fluminense · BRGerman Primate Center · DEGuarulhos University · BRInstituto de Medicina Avançada · BRNova Southeastern University · USUniversidade Federal de Ouro Preto · BRUniversidade Federal de Viçosa · BRUniversity of Stirling · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mammalian captive dietary specialists like folivores are prone to gastrointestinal distress and primate dietary specialists suffer the greatest gut microbiome diversity losses in captivity compared to the wild. Marmosets represent another group of dietary specialists, exudivores that eat plant exudates, but whose microbiome remains relatively less studied. The common occurrence of gastrointestinal distress in captive marmosets prompted us to study the Callithrix gut microbiome composition and predictive function through bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA V4 region sequencing. We sampled 59 wild and captive Callithrix across four species and their hybrids. Host environment had a stronger effect on the gut microbiome than host taxon. Wild Callithrix gut microbiomes were enriched for Bifidobacterium, which process host-indigestible carbohydrates. Captive marmoset guts were enriched for Enterobacteriaceae, a family containing pathogenic bacteria. While gut microbiome function was similar across marmosets, Enterobacteriaceae seem to carry out most functional activities in captive host guts. More diverse bacterial taxa seem to perform gut functions in wild marmosets, with Bifidobacterium being important for carbohydrate metabolism. Captive marmosets showed gut microbiome composition aspects seen in human gastrointestinal diseases. Thus, captivity may perturb the exudivore gut microbiome, which raises implications for captive exudivore welfare and calls for husbandry modifications.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsBacteriaBifidobacteriumCallithrixFecesMammalsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID35322053
PMCPMC8942988
OpenAlexW4221135969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.