Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35321672›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2022

Risk factors for reoperation due to periprosthetic joint infection after elective total hip arthroplasty: a study of 35,056 patients using linked data of the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Registry (SHAR) and Swedish Perioperative Registry (SPOR).

Maria Qvistgaard, Jonatan Nåtman, Jenny Lovebo, Sofia Almerud-Österberg, Ola Rolfson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Outcomes of Regional Block in Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty for Prosthetic Joint Infection.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maria QvistgaardLinnaeus University, Faculty of health and Life Sciences, Universitetsplatsen 1, 352 32, Vaxjo, Sweden. maria.qvistgaard@lnu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5173-9484
Jonatan NåtmanSwedish Joint Arthroplasty Register, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Jenny LoveboLinnaeus University, Faculty of health and Life Sciences, Universitetsplatsen 1, 352 32, Vaxjo, Sweden.
Sofia Almerud-ÖsterbergLinnaeus University, Faculty of health and Life Sciences, Universitetsplatsen 1, 352 32, Vaxjo, Sweden.
Ola RolfsonSwedish Joint Arthroplasty Register, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Linnaeus University · SEThe Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Sweden, the incidence of a prosthetic joint infection (PJI) after a planned Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) is 1.3%, but the worldwide incidence of PJI after THA is unknown. This study explores associations between reoperation due to PJI and potential risk factors.

methodsPrimary elective THA surgery registered in both the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Registry (SHAR) and the Swedish Perioperative Registry (SPOR) between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2019 were included in this registry study, resulting in a total study population of 35,056 cases. The outcome variable was reoperation as the result of PJI within a year after surgery. Data were analysed using a multivariable Cox regression model.

resultsReoperation due to PJI occurred in 460 cases (i.e., 1.3% of the study population). Each year of age increased the risk with 2% (HR 1.02 Cl 1.01, 1.03 P = < 0.001). Compared to men, women had significantly less risk for reoperation (HR 2.17 Cl 1.79, 2.53 P = < 0.001). For patients with obesity (BMI > 30), the risk increased considerably compared to underweight, normal weight, or overweight patients (HR 1.89 Cl 1.43, 2.51 P = < 0.001). The risk also increased by 6% for every 10 min of operative time (HR 1.06 Cl 1.02, 1.09 P = < 0.001). Patients having general anaesthesia had greater risk compared to those with spinal anaesthesia (HR 1.34 Cl 1.04, 1.73 P = 0.024). Finally, a lateral approach showed higher risk of reoperation than a posterior approach (HR 1.43 Cl 1.18, 1.73 P = < 0.001).

conclusionRecognition of the several risk factors identified in this study will be important for the perioperative management of patients undergoing THA.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipProsthesis-Related InfectionsFemaleHumansMaleRegistriesReoperationRisk FactorsSemantic WebSwedenOperative timePeriprosthetic joint infectionPreventionReoperationTotal hip arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID35321672
PMCPMC8944083
OpenAlexW4220973467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.