Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35321648›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2022

Comparative transcriptome analysis of heat stress responses of Clematis lanuginosa and Clematis crassifolia.

Renjuan Qian, Qingdi Hu, Xiaohua Ma, Xule Zhang, Youju Ye, Hongjian Liu, Handong Gao, Jian Zheng

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Genome-Wide Analysis of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Transcriptomic Analysis of Heat Stress Response inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Frontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Renjuan Qian *College of Forestry, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, 210037, China.
Qingdi Hu *Wenzhou Key Laboratory of Resource Plant Innovation and Utilization, Zhejiang Institute of Subtropical Crops, Wenzhou, 325005, Zhejiang, China. qingdihu@163.com.
Xiaohua MaWenzhou Key Laboratory of Resource Plant Innovation and Utilization, Zhejiang Institute of Subtropical Crops, Wenzhou, 325005, Zhejiang, China.
Xule ZhangWenzhou Key Laboratory of Resource Plant Innovation and Utilization, Zhejiang Institute of Subtropical Crops, Wenzhou, 325005, Zhejiang, China.
Youju YeWenzhou Key Laboratory of Resource Plant Innovation and Utilization, Zhejiang Institute of Subtropical Crops, Wenzhou, 325005, Zhejiang, China.
Hongjian LiuWenzhou Key Laboratory of Resource Plant Innovation and Utilization, Zhejiang Institute of Subtropical Crops, Wenzhou, 325005, Zhejiang, China.
Handong GaoCollege of Forestry, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, 210037, China. gaohd@njfu.edu.cn.
Jian ZhengWenzhou Key Laboratory of Resource Plant Innovation and Utilization, Zhejiang Institute of Subtropical Crops, Wenzhou, 325005, Zhejiang, China. zjyzs@126.com.
Zhejiang Institute of Subtropical CropsNanjing Forestry University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClematis species are attractive ornamental plants with a variety of flower colors and patterns. Heat stress is one of the main factors restricting the growth, development, and ornamental value of Clematis. Clematis lanuginosa and Clematis crassifolia are large-flowered and evergreen Clematis species, respectively, that show different tolerance to heat stress. We compared and analyzed the transcriptome of C. lanuginose and C. crassifolia under heat stress to determine the regulatory mechanism(s) of resistance.

resultsA total of 1720 and 6178 differentially expressed genes were identified from C. lanuginose and C. crassifolia, respectively. The photosynthesis and oxidation-reduction processes of C. crassifolia were more sensitive than C. lanuginose under heat stress. Glycine/serine/threonine metabolism, glyoxylic metabolism, and thiamine metabolism were important pathways in response to heat stress in C. lanuginose, and flavonoid biosynthesis, phenylalanine metabolism, and arginine/proline metabolism were the key pathways in C. crassifolia. Six sHSPs (c176964_g1, c200771_g1, c204924_g1, c199407_g2, c201522_g2, c192936_g1), POD1 (c200317_g1), POD3 (c210145_g2), DREB2 (c182557_g1), and HSFA2 (c206233_g2) may be key genes in the response to heat stress in C. lanuginose and C. crassifolia.

conclusionsWe compared important metabolic pathways and differentially expressed genes in response to heat stress between C. lanuginose and C. crassifolia. The results increase our understanding of the response mechanism and candidate genes of Clematis under heat stress. These data may contribute to the development of new Clematis varieties with greater heat tolerance.

Indexed as

ClematisTranscriptomeGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, PlantHeat-Shock ResponseClematis crassifoliaClematis lanuginosaHeat stressPathway analysisTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID35321648
PMCPMC8941805
OpenAlexW4220672741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.