Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35321598›Full record

SynthesisJournal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc2022

A systematic review of the utility of biomarkers as aids in the early diagnosis and outcome prediction of bovine respiratory disease complex in feedlot cattle.

Jing Li, Yiping Zhu, Brian Shoemake, Bo Liu, Pamela Adkins, Laurie Wallace

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jing LiDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1361-4525
Yiping ZhuDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Brian ShoemakeCollege of Veterinary Medicine & Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7520-6394
Bo LiuDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Pamela AdkinsCollege of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Laurie WallaceCollege of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
China Agricultural University · CNMissouri College · USTexas A&M University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bovine respiratory disease complex (BRDC) is a common, serious problem in feedlot cattle worldwide. Early diagnosis and outcome prediction are critical for making decisions to prevent economic loss and to limit antimicrobial use. Diagnosing BRDC is commonly based on visual signs and behavioral changes; both assessments are considered to have low diagnostic accuracy. Biomarkers are important for supporting the diagnosis of BRDC, determining the necessity and potential outcomes of treatment, and assisting in research in which differentiating diseased animals is required. There are few reviews summarizing the biomarkers available and utilized. We systematically evaluated the detection and prognostic potential of biomarkers from the literature published between January 1990 and December 2020. We performed a descriptive analysis of 5 biomarker categories: acute-phase proteins, stress-related hormones, other blood biomarkers, omics biomarkers, and non-blood biomarkers. The retrieved articles consisted of studies or trials that assessed the detection value and treatment and/or outcome prediction efficacy of biomarkers for BRDC in feedlot cattle; 23 manuscripts for review and analysis satisfied the selection criteria. Based on our review, we cannot recommend a specific biomarker as the sole method for the early detection or outcome prediction for BRDC, given that the application and efficacy of biomarkers varies in different situations. Our systematic review may serve as a reference for clinical and research investigations of early detection and outcome prediction of BRDC.

Indexed as

Bovine Respiratory Disease ComplexCattle DiseasesAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiomarkersCattleEarly DiagnosisPrognosisAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiomarkersbiomarkersbovine respiratory disease complexearly diagnosisfeedlot cattleoutcome prediction

Identifiers

PMID35321598
PMCPMC9266496
OpenAlexW4220937782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.