Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35321360›Full record

ArticleNature computational science2021

Fast and effective protein model refinement using deep graph neural networks.

Xiaoyang Jing, Jinbo Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature computational science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Recent advances and challenges in protein complex model accuracy estimation.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Low-Data Drug Design with Few-Shot Generative Domain Adaptation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Chemistry-informed molecular graph as reaction descriptor for machine-learned retrosynthesis planning.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  15. Deep graph learning of inter-protein contacts.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xiaoyang JingToyota Technological Institute at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
Jinbo XuToyota Technological Institute at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.

Funding

New Computational Methods for Data-driven Protein Structure PredictionR01GM089753 · NIGMS · TOYOTA TECHNOLOGICAL INSTITUTE / CHICAGO · PI XU, JINBO · 2010 to 2023
$3.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM089753
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein model refinement is the last step applied to improve the quality of a predicted protein model. Currently the most successful refinement methods rely on extensive conformational sampling and thus, take hours or days to refine even a single protein model. Here we propose a fast and effective model refinement method that applies GNN (graph neural networks) to predict refined inter-atom distance probability distribution from an initial model and then rebuilds 3D models from the predicted distance distribution. Tested on the CASP (Critical Assessment of Structure Prediction) refinement targets, our method has comparable accuracy as two leading human groups Feig and Baker, but runs substantially faster. Our method may refine one protein model within ~11 minutes on 1 CPU while Baker needs ~30 hours on 60 CPUs and Feig needs ~16 hours on 1 GPU. Finally, our study shows that GNN outperforms ResNet (convolutional residual neural networks) for model refinement when very limited conformational sampling is allowed.

Identifiers

PMID35321360
PMCPMC8939834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.