Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35321322›Full record

ArticleResearch in science education2022

Group Level Assessment (GLA) as a methodological tool to facilitate science education.

Lisa M Vaughn, Farrah Jacquez, Alice Deters, Alicia Boards

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research in science education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lisa M VaughnPediatrics Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center/University of Cincinnati College of Medicine.
Farrah JacquezDepartment of Psychology, University of Cincinnati, PO Box 2210376, Cincinnati, OH 45229.
Alice DetersUniversity of Cincinnati, 2610 McMicken Circle, Cincinnati, OH 45221.
Alicia BoardsUniversity of Cincinnati, 2610 McMicken Circle, Cincinnati, OH 45221.

Funding

Growing Community Change Researchers in STEMR25GM129234 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI JACQUEZ, FARRAH M · 2018 to 2021
$839k
Growing Community Change Researchers in STEMR25OD023763 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI JACQUEZ, FARRAH M · 2017 to 2017
$255k
NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM129234NIH HHS R25 OD023763
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Group Level Assessment (GLA) is a qualitative, participatory research methodology that can be used within science education, specifically to meet the Science and Engineering Practices dimension of the K-12 Next Generation Science Standards. In contrast to traditional qualitative research methods, GLA is a concrete methodological tool intended for large groups. GLA follows a 7-step process in which diverse stakeholders work together to generate, analyze and prioritize ideas that lead to action planning. Emphasizing personal relevance, shared decision making, systematic inquiry, and collaboration in the design and process, GLA is best positioned conceptually and theoretically within community-based participatory research and inquiry-based learning approaches. The purpose of this manuscript is to describe how GLA can be utilized as an innovative methodology to incorporate students' lived experiences in science education. We describe how to conduct GLA and provide a case example of GLA in action conducted as part of a larger science education program with students and teachers in STEM.

Indexed as

community-based participatory researchGroup level assessmentinquiry-based learningscience educationSTEMyouth

Identifiers

PMID35321322
PMCPMC8937028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.