Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35321277›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastrointestinal oncology2022

Evolving roles of magnifying endoscopy and endoscopic resection for neoplasia in inflammatory bowel diseases.

Shintaro Akiyama, Taku Sakamoto, Joshua M Steinberg, Yutaka Saito, Kiichiro Tsuchiya

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shintaro AkiyamaDepartment of Gastroenterology, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8575, Japan. akiyama@md.tsukuba.ac.jp.
Taku SakamotoDepartment of Gastroenterology, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8575, Japan.
Joshua M SteinbergDepartment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Gastroenterology of the Rockies, Denver, CO 80218, United States.
Yutaka SaitoEndoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan.
Kiichiro TsuchiyaDepartment of Gastroenterology, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8575, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnifying endoscopy is a useful technique to differentiate neoplasia from non-neoplastic lesions. Data regarding the clinical utility of magnifying endoscopy for neoplasia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has been emerging. While Kudo's pit pattern types III-V are findings suggestive of neoplasia in non-IBD patients, these pit patterns are predictive of IBD-associated neoplasia as well. However, active chronic inflammatory processes, particularly regenerative changes, can mimic neoplastic pit patterns and may affect a meticulous evaluation of pit pattern diagnosis in patients with IBD. The clinical evidence regarding the utility of magnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging or endocytoscopy has also been evolving in regard to the diagnosis of IBD-associated neoplasia. These advanced endoscopic techniques are promising for multiple reasons; not only for making an accurate diagnosis of neoplasia, but also in determining if endoscopic resection is appropriate for such lesions in patients with IBD. In this review, we discuss the diagnostic accuracy and limitations of magnifying endoscopy in assessing IBD-associated neoplasia and examine the feasibility and outcomes of endoscopic resection for these lesions.

Indexed as

Endoscopic resectionInflammatory bowel diseaseMagnifying endoscopyNeoplasiaUlcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID35321277
PMCPMC8919023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.