Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35321042›Full record

ReviewClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2022

Congenital Hypertrophy of the Retinal Pigment Epithelium (CHRPE) as a Screening Marker for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP): Systematic Literature Review and Screening Recommendations.

Louis Antoine Bonnet, R Max Conway, Li-Anne Lim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Louis Antoine BonnetUniversity of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9315-9234
R Max ConwayUniversity of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Li-Anne LimUniversity of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) has an almost 100% colorectal cancer risk warranting early detection in gene carriers. This study presents congenital hypertrophy of the retinal pigment epithelium (CHRPE) as a highly specific phenotypical marker for FAP that can be used in screening at-risk individuals. Screening recommendations including morphological subclassification were formulated with supporting literature. Methods: A systematic literature review with a comprehensive search strategy was conducted using online databases. Manual searches of bibliographies and reference lists were also performed. Studies meeting inclusion criteria were graded with respect to their hierarchy of evidence and strength of recommendations according to the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) guidelines of Australia. Results: Almost 4500 participants were analysed across 28 included studies. The mean specificity of CHRPE as a phenotypical screening marker of FAP was 89% (standard deviation (SD); 14) with a mean sensitivity of 79% (SD; 8). The mean prevalence of CHRPE amongst FAP participants; at-risk participants were found to be 76% (SD; 24) and 37% (SD; 21) respectively. Bilateralism and multiple lesion number ≥3 are features highly specific for FAP. Conclusion: CHRPE was found to be a non-invasive, rapid, early phenotypical screening marker of FAP. Clinical recognition further allows increased gene analysis efficiency. The absence of CHRPE alone cannot exclude FAP. Our screening recommendations provide guidance to clinicians on evidence based CHRPE assessment. We would advocate inclusion of ocular examinations as part of a three-pronged approach, along with endoscopy and genetic testing, for efficient, timely FAP assessment in at-risk individuals.

Indexed as

congenital anomaliesgenetic diseaseretinal examinationscreening

Identifiers

PMID35321042
PMCPMC8934868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.