ArticleWellcome open research2022
Public attitudes to a human challenge study with SARS-CoV-2: a mixed-methods study.
Article in Wellcome open research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Ethical Analysis of Public Attitudes towards Controlled Human Infection Studies in Singapore: Acceptability and Payment.Asian bioethics review · 2026Article
- Best Practices in the Development and Use of Experimental Models of Bacterial Pneumonia: An Official American Thoracic Society Workshop Report.American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology · 2025Article
- Response to comment about article 'changes in memory and cognition during the SARS-CoV-2 human challenge study'.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- Mixed-methods study assessing the acceptability and feasibility of Human Challenge Studies for Disease X in Healthy UK Adults in a SARS-CoV-2 pandemic setting.BMJ public health · 2025Article
- Scientific highlights of the 9th ESWI Influenza Conference.One health outlook · 2024Article
- Ethical acceptability of human challenge trials: Consultation with the US public and with research personnel.PloS one · 2024Article
- The role of public involvement in the design of the first SARS-CoV-2 human challenge study during an evolving pandemic.Epidemics · 2022Article
- Safety, tolerability and viral kinetics during SARS-CoV-2 human challenge in young adults.Nature medicine · 2022Article
- Public attitudes to a human challenge study with SARS-CoV-2: a mixed-methods study.Wellcome open research · 2022Article
- Public perceptions About Foreign Investment, A PLS-SEM Analysis toward republic sustainable infrastructure.PloS one · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.