Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35320956›Full record

ArticleAnesthesia, essays and researches

Comparative Study to Evaluate the Effect of Ultrasound-Guided Pericapsular Nerve Group Block Versus Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block on the Postoperative Analgesic Effect in Patients Undergoing Surgeries for Hip Fracture under Spinal Anesthesia.

Pratheeba Natrajan, Ravindra Rahuveera Bhat, R Remadevi, Idhuyya Raajesh Joseph, S Vijayalakshmi, T Deepak Paulose

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Anesthesia, essays and researches. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06677606 narecruitingnot on this map

The Analgesic Efficacy of Pericapsular Nerve Group Block (PENG) in Comparison With Periarticular Local Anesthetic Infiltration (PAI) Undergoing Hip Hemiarthroplasty : a Randomized Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorFayoum University HospitalRan2024 to 2025Enrolled54ConditionsPost Operative PainArmsPENG block, PAI block
NCT07442721 narecruitingnot on this map

Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Pericapsular Nerve Group Block For Analgesia In Hip Hemi Arthroplasty: A Randomized Comparative Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorFayoum University HospitalRan2026 to 2027Enrolled80ConditionsHip Arthroplasty, Hip Fracture Surgeries, Femoral Neck Fractures, Postoperative PainArmsSacral erector spinae plane block, PENG block
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pratheeba NatrajanDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Indira Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Puducherry, India.
Ravindra Rahuveera BhatDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Indira Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Puducherry, India.
R RemadeviDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Indira Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Puducherry, India.
Idhuyya Raajesh JosephDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Indira Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Puducherry, India.
S VijayalakshmiDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Indira Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Puducherry, India.
T Deepak PauloseDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Indira Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Puducherry, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Fractures in and around the hip are a major concern in young as well as the elderly. Ultrasound-guided (USG) peripheral nerve blocks help in early surgical fixation of these fractures by providing perioperative pain relief as well as early mobilization resulting in reduced morbidity and mortality. Aims: This study aims to compare the efficacy of USG pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block versus fascia iliaca compartment (FIC) block. Setting and Design: Prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled study. Materials and Methods: Twenty-four patients above 18 years of age with hip fracture belonging to the American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status Classes I and II scheduled for hip surgery were randomly allocated into two groups. Group 1(PENG block) received USG-guided PENG block and Group 2 (FIC block) received USG guided FIC block for postoperative pain relief. Postoperative pain relief (at rest) was evaluated by Numeric Rating Scale score from 20 Statistical Analysis Used: Data were analyzed by using nonparametric test and Chi-square test. Hemodynamic variables and pain scores were analyzed using analysis of variance for two groups and independent Results: Postoperative NRS score was higher in FIC block than PENG block which was statistically significant at 1 h ( Conclusions: PENG block provides better postoperative analgesia, with reduced requirement of rescue analgesics in 24 h as compared to FIC block in patients undergoing surgeries for hip fracture under spinal anesthesia.

Indexed as

Analgesicsfascia iliaca compartment blockhip fracturenumeric rating scale scorepericapsular nerve group blockultrasound

Identifiers

PMID35320956
PMCPMC8936861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.