ArticleNeuropathology and applied neurobiology2022
A CTNNB1-altered medulloblastoma shows the immunophenotypic, DNA methylation and transcriptomic profiles of SHH-activated, and not WNT-activated, medulloblastoma.
Article in Neuropathology and applied neurobiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biomarkers of Treatment Response in Paediatric Medulloblastoma.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Reveals LEF1-Driven Wnt Pathway Activation as a Shared Oncogenic Program in Hepatoblastoma and Medulloblastoma.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
- Medulloblastoma: biology and immunotherapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Recent advancements in molecular characterisation have identified four principal molecular groups of medulloblastoma: WNT, SHH, group 3 and group 4. Each has its characteristic clinical features, signature genetic alterations and distinct DNA methylome profiles. Thus far, CTNNB1 mutations have been considered pathognomonic of WNT-activated medulloblastoma. Furthermore, it has been shown that CTNNB1 mutations dominantly drive the WNT-activated phenotype in medulloblastoma, even in the presence of alterations in the SHH pathway. We herein report an illustrative case that challenges this belief-a medulloblastoma with a pathogenic CTNNB1 mutation that otherwise showed the histopathology, immunophenotype and methylation and transcriptomic profiles of an SHH-activated medulloblastoma. Detailed molecular analyses, including whole exome sequencing, transcriptome analysis and DNA methylation profiling with DKFZ brain tumour classifier and St. Jude MLPnet neural network classifier analyses, have been performed on the tumour. Our example emphasises the diagnostic value of the immunohistochemistry panel with YAP1, GAB1 and β-catenin and DNA methylation profiling, combined with exome sequencing, in the characterisation of medulloblastoma. CTNNB1 mutations are not specific for WNT-activated medulloblastoma, and different CTNNB1 mutations have diverse oncogenic potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.