Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35320576›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2022

Recording and Quantifying C. elegans Behavior.

Navin Pokala, Steven W Flavell

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Automated analysis ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Navin Pokala *Department of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Theobald Science Center, New York Institute of Technology, Old Westbury, NY, USA. navin.pokala@nyit.edu.
Steven W Flavell *Department of Brain & Cognitive Sciences, Picower Institute for Learning & Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA. flavell@mit.edu.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology · USNew York Institute of Technology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies of C. elegans behavior have been crucial in identifying genetic pathways that control nervous system development and function, as well as basic principles of neural circuit function. Modern analysis of C. elegans behavior commonly relies on video recordings of animals, followed by automated image analysis and behavior quantification. Here, we describe two methods for recording and quantifying C. elegans behavior: a single-worm tracking approach that provides high-resolution behavioral data for individual animals and a multi-worm tracking approach that allows for quantification of the behavior of many animals in parallel. These approaches should be useful to a wide range of researchers studying the nervous system and behavior of C. elegans.

Indexed as

Caenorhabditis elegansCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsAnimalsBehavior, AnimalImage Processing, Computer-AssistedVideo RecordingCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsBehaviorBehavioral statesC. elegansQuantitative behavioral analysisTracking software

Identifiers

PMID35320576
OpenAlexW4220990243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.