Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35320514›Full record

ArticleAmbio2022

Conceptualizing controversies in the EU circular bioeconomy transition.

Jan R Starke, Tamara A P Metze, Jeroen J L Candel, Catrien J A M Termeer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ambio, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jan R StarkeDepartment of Social Sciences, Public Administration and Policy Group, Wageningen University & Research, 6700 EW, Wageningen, The Netherlands. jan.starke@wur.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8169-1215
Tamara A P MetzeDepartment of Social Sciences, Public Administration and Policy Group, Wageningen University & Research, 6700 EW, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Jeroen J L CandelDepartment of Social Sciences, Public Administration and Policy Group, Wageningen University & Research, 6700 EW, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Catrien J A M TermeerDepartment of Social Sciences, Public Administration and Policy Group, Wageningen University & Research, 6700 EW, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 860477
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The transition towards a circular bioeconomy (CBE) in the European Union is not without contestation. In particular, research has highlighted potential trade-offs of the large-scale production of bio-resources, for instance with environmental quality goals. To date, however, it remains underexplored in the CBE literature how controversies develop throughout a transition process. To address this gap, this paper explores where controversies are situated in a transition, how they change throughout, and how they influence the transition process. First, we suggest that controversies can be situated on and between different system layers within a transition. Second, we offer an explanation of how controversies evolve, as actors confirm, integrate, disintegrate and polarize underlying storylines. Third, these controversies can have both productive and unproductive outcomes while they unfold throughout a transition. We illustrate this understanding with the example of biorefineries as CBE key technology and discuss a research agenda on controversies in sustainability transitions.

Indexed as

Economic DevelopmentEuropean UnionBiorefineryCircular bioeconomyDiscourse coalitionEuropean UnionPolicy controversySustainability transition

Identifiers

PMID35320514
PMCPMC9378795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.