ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2022
The clinical approach to the identification of higher-order visual dysfunction in neurodegenerative disease.
Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessing higher-order visual functions: seeing beyond a flat earth.Dementia & neuropsychologia · 2025Review
- Visuospatial processing in patients with Alzheimer's disease and cerebral amyloid angiopathy.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Retinal Alterations Predict Early Prodromal Signs of Neurodegenerative Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Human senses and sensors from Aristotle to the present.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThis review is intended to assist the reader in gaining the knowledge and skills necessary for the recognition and assessment of higher-order visual dysfunction due to neurodegenerative diseases including Alzheimer's disease, dementia with Lewy bodies, Parkinson's dementia, corticobasal degeneration, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, and the posterior cortical atrophy syndrome. Clinical problem-solving and pattern recognition must be developed and practiced to accurately diagnosis disturbances of higher-order visual function, and knowledge of higher-order visual brain regions and their visual syndromes forms the foundation for deciphering symptoms presented by patients and/or their care partners. Tests of higher-order visual dysfunction must be assembled by the clinician and assessment can take time and effort. The use of screening tests, follow-up visits, and formal neuropsychological referrals are critical components for accurate diagnosis and these principles are reviewed here. RECENT
findingsA recent survey of neuro-ophthalmologists revealed that over half of the respondents report that 5-10% of their new patient referrals carry a diagnosis of neurodegenerative disease and many patients were referred for visual symptoms of unknown cause. Despite over a century of discovery related to higher-order visual functions of the human brain, translation of discovery to the clinical assessment of patients has been slow or absent. As with the approach to translational medicine in general, to see meaningful progress, an interdisciplinary approach is indispensable. The first step involves the application of discoveries from the field visual neuroscience by clinicians from the fields of ophthalmology, neurology, and neuropsychology, and from the disciplines of neuro-ophthalmology and behavioral neurology. The unmet need for recognition, assessment, and management of higher-order visual dysfunction in neurodegeneration is evident and clinicians can contribute to closing the gap by using the approach and the tools outlined in the review.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.