Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35320465›Full record

ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2022

Management of Functional Vision Disorders.

Ragini Phansalkar, A Juliana Lockman, Surbhi Bansal, Heather E Moss

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ragini PhansalkarSchool of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
A Juliana LockmanDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Surbhi BansalDepartment of Ophthalmology, Stanford University, CA, Palo Alto, USA.
Heather E MossDepartment of Ophthalmology, Stanford University, CA, Palo Alto, USA. hemoss@stanford.edu.
Stanford University · US

Funding

Stanford Vision Research CoreP30EY026877 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Jeffrey L Goldberg · 2017 to 2026
$8.0M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY026877
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe purpose of this review is to summarize current approaches to management of functional vision disorder (FVD). RECENT

findingsSeveral retrospective studies of FVD in both adults and children have shed light on the range of outcomes and the prevalence of psychosocial stressors among FVD patients. While the first line of treatment for FVD is reassurance and education, recent case reports highlight the use of additional treatment modalities including psychotherapy, hypnosis, and transcranial magnetic stimulation in specific cases. Although the epidemiology and diagnosis of functional vision disorder are well described, there is limited evidence supporting treatment modalities. Nevertheless, the majority of patients improve with conservative management including reassurance, education, and appropriate follow-up. Additional approaches such as mental health care referral can be considered in refractory cases.

Indexed as

Transcranial Magnetic StimulationVision DisordersAdultChildHumansPrevalenceRetrospective StudiesFunctional neurological disorderFunctional vision disorderMental healthReassurance

Identifiers

PMID35320465
PMCPMC9159901
OpenAlexW4220700537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.