Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35320457›Full record

ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2022

A customized acutance metric for quality control applications in MRI.

Simi Venuji Renuka, Damodar Reddy Edla, Justin Joseph

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Simi Venuji RenukaSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, VIT Bhopal University, Bhopal, 466114, India. simikailas13@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9674-4853
Damodar Reddy EdlaSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, VIT Bhopal University, Bhopal, 466114, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5040-0745
Justin JosephSchool of Bioengineering, VIT University, Bhopal, 466114, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6705-9902

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acutance is a subjective parameter which indicates the quality of edges in an image. Objective metrics for measuring image acutance are helpful for designing new imaging protocols and sequences in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies. In addition to this, image acutance metrics have a significant role in the design and optimisation of post-processing algorithms used for restoration and sharpening of MR imagery. Most of the existing blur/sharpness metrics are specifically designed for natural-scene (panoramic) images. A blur/sharpness metric suitable for MR imaging applications is absent in the literature. To fill this gap, a computationally fast metric, 'largest local gradient-based sharpness metric (LLGSM)', for measuring sharpness and blur in MR imagery, is proposed in this paper. The LLGSM is the root mean square (RMS) of exponentially weighted elements in an array of lexicographically ordered largest local gradient (LLG) values in the image, sorted in descending order. In terms of overall agreement with subjective scores, and computational speed, the LLGSM is observed to be more efficient than its alternatives available in the literature.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingQuality ControlAcutanceBlur metricEdge quality indexImage sharpnessUnsharp masking

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.