ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2022
A customized acutance metric for quality control applications in MRI.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Unsharp masking image enhancement the parallel algorithm based on cross-platform.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acutance is a subjective parameter which indicates the quality of edges in an image. Objective metrics for measuring image acutance are helpful for designing new imaging protocols and sequences in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies. In addition to this, image acutance metrics have a significant role in the design and optimisation of post-processing algorithms used for restoration and sharpening of MR imagery. Most of the existing blur/sharpness metrics are specifically designed for natural-scene (panoramic) images. A blur/sharpness metric suitable for MR imaging applications is absent in the literature. To fill this gap, a computationally fast metric, 'largest local gradient-based sharpness metric (LLGSM)', for measuring sharpness and blur in MR imagery, is proposed in this paper. The LLGSM is the root mean square (RMS) of exponentially weighted elements in an array of lexicographically ordered largest local gradient (LLG) values in the image, sorted in descending order. In terms of overall agreement with subjective scores, and computational speed, the LLGSM is observed to be more efficient than its alternatives available in the literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35320457What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.