Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35320429›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2022

Prevalence and clinical features of secondary skin lesions in septic patients with bloodstream infections.

Ana Pulido-Perez, Carlos Sanchez-Carrillo, Marta Bergon-Sendin, Ricardo Suarez-Fernandez, Angel Manuel Rosell-Diaz, Patricia Muñoz, Emilio Bouza

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ana Pulido-Perez *Department of Dermatology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, C/Doctor Esquerdo 46, 28007, Madrid, Spain. ana.pulido@salud.madrid.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0333-6090
Carlos Sanchez-CarrilloDepartment of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Marta Bergon-SendinDepartment of Dermatology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, C/Doctor Esquerdo 46, 28007, Madrid, Spain.
Ricardo Suarez-FernandezDepartment of Dermatology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, C/Doctor Esquerdo 46, 28007, Madrid, Spain.
Angel Manuel Rosell-DiazDepartment of Dermatology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, C/Doctor Esquerdo 46, 28007, Madrid, Spain.
Patricia MuñozInstituto de Investigación Biomédica Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Emilio Bouza *Instituto de Investigación Biomédica Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Universidad Complutense de Madrid · ESHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cutaneous manifestations developed in the course of sepsis are poorly documented in the medical literature beyond those related to specific pathogens or classical clinical pictures such as purpura fulminans or ecthyma gangrenosum. The objective of this study was to determine the overall prevalence of sepsis-related skin findings and evaluate their possible impact on the prognosis of septic patients. Single-centre, retrospective study of septic patients with documented bloodstream infections admitted in a tertiary hospital during 2019. Primary skin and soft tissue infections, and non-sepsis-related skin conditions diagnosed during hospital admission were excluded. Unselected sample of 320 episodes of sepsis in 265 patients. Secondary skin lesions were documented in 57 sepsis episodes (17.8%) in 47 patients. Purpura (petechiae/ecchymosis) was the most frequent cutaneous finding in septic patients (35.5%), with non-acral involvement in more than one-third of the episodes (38.5%), followed by skin and soft tissue erythema/oedema (25.8%) and maculopapular rashes (11.3%). Secondary skin lesions occurred more frequently in sepsis of respiratory (p = 0.027) and skin and soft tissue (p = 0.018) origin, as well as in sepsis caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (p = 0.001). Mean hospital stay was 38.58 days and sepsis-related mortality 21.1%. Our results suggest that cutaneous involvement in the course of sepsis is frequent, with purpura being the main clinical sign. The semiology described in this study, easily identifiable by non-dermatologists, should alert clinicians to the potential unfavourable course of these patients.

Indexed as

Pseudomonas InfectionsPurpura FulminansSepsisSkin NeoplasmsHumansPrevalenceRetrospective StudiesBacteraemiaEcthyma gangrenosumPurpuraPurpura fulminansSepsis

Identifiers

PMID35320429
OpenAlexW4220832648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.