Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35320372›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2022

The heavier the arm, the higher the action: the effects of forearm-weight changes on reach-to-grasp movements.

Luna Ando, Yoshihiro Itaguchi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Luna AndoDepartment of Computer Science, Shizuoka University, Hamamatsu, 432-8011, Japan.
Yoshihiro ItaguchiDepartment of Psychology, Keio University, 2-15-45 Mita, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 108-8345, Japan. itaguchi@keio.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2033-2171

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 17H06345Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 20H01785
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Usually, our bodily movements are performed against gravity. Most studies using a force field have focused on adaptation processes to force applied in the horizontal plane, which is novel to us, but not to force in the gravitational direction. The present study investigated the immediate effects (aftereffects) of a force toward the gravitational direction on the kinematics of reach-to-grasp movements as well as short-term adaptation to the force, simply by adding a weight to participants' forearm. Healthy young adults performed blocks of 10 reach-to-grasp movements under three weight conditions; as the weights were changed between blocks, the participants experienced weight changes ranging from - 200 to + 200 g. We obtained three main results; first, the height of movement trajectory (trajectory height) was remarkably higher immediately after the forearm weight changed to lighter than after the weight changed to heavier, suggesting that participants planed the trajectory height with the same muscle efforts as in the previous trial. Second, the trajectory height at the end of the block became higher only in 200 g condition, indicating that the participants could not achieve same trajectory height as that without any weight load, at least in ten trials of adaptation period to the 200 g weight load. Third, the coordination between reach and grasp components was preserved immediately after forearm-weight changes. These findings may contribute to further understand how we perform adaptive reach-to-grasp movements with frequent weight changes that are inevitable in everyday life.

Indexed as

ArmForearmBiomechanical PhenomenaHand StrengthHumansMovementPsychomotor PerformanceYoung AdultAdaptationGraspingLoadPerturbationReaching

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.