ArticleExperimental brain research2022
The heavier the arm, the higher the action: the effects of forearm-weight changes on reach-to-grasp movements.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Trajectory elevation in reach-to-grasp movements under increased arm weight and repeated trials.Experimental brain research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Usually, our bodily movements are performed against gravity. Most studies using a force field have focused on adaptation processes to force applied in the horizontal plane, which is novel to us, but not to force in the gravitational direction. The present study investigated the immediate effects (aftereffects) of a force toward the gravitational direction on the kinematics of reach-to-grasp movements as well as short-term adaptation to the force, simply by adding a weight to participants' forearm. Healthy young adults performed blocks of 10 reach-to-grasp movements under three weight conditions; as the weights were changed between blocks, the participants experienced weight changes ranging from - 200 to + 200 g. We obtained three main results; first, the height of movement trajectory (trajectory height) was remarkably higher immediately after the forearm weight changed to lighter than after the weight changed to heavier, suggesting that participants planed the trajectory height with the same muscle efforts as in the previous trial. Second, the trajectory height at the end of the block became higher only in 200 g condition, indicating that the participants could not achieve same trajectory height as that without any weight load, at least in ten trials of adaptation period to the 200 g weight load. Third, the coordination between reach and grasp components was preserved immediately after forearm-weight changes. These findings may contribute to further understand how we perform adaptive reach-to-grasp movements with frequent weight changes that are inevitable in everyday life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35320372What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.