Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35320355›Full record

ArticleCancer research2022

Differential Gain-of-Function Activity of Three p53 Hotspot Mutants In Vivo.

Shunbin Xiong, Dhruv Chachad, Yun Zhang, Jovanka Gencel-Augusto, Mario Sirito, Vinod Pant, Peirong Yang, Chang Sun, Gilda Chau, Yuan Qi and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Targeting p53 pathways: mechanisms, structures, and advances in therapy.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Mutant p53Molecular oncology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Involvement ofFrontiers in oncology · 2025
    Review
  18. Are TP53 mutations all alike?Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shunbin XiongDepartment of Genetics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, UT Health Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, Texas.
Dhruv ChachadDepartment of Genetics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, UT Health Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0003-3131-7679
Yun ZhangDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Texas Southern University, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-3943-2615
Jovanka Gencel-AugustoDepartment of Genetics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, UT Health Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0003-1333-415X
Mario SiritoDepartment of Genetics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, UT Health Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, Texas.
Vinod PantDepartment of Genetics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, UT Health Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, Texas.
Peirong YangDepartment of Genetics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, UT Health Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, Texas.
Chang SunDepartment of Genetics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, UT Health Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-2080-5450
Gilda ChauDepartment of Genetics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, UT Health Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-7907-3290
Yuan QiDepartment of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0001-9718-7593
Xiaoping SuDepartment of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0003-1824-943X
Elizabeth M WhitleyDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Adel K El-NaggarDepartment of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Guillermina LozanoDepartment of Genetics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, UT Health Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0001-8985-4886
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USTexas Southern University · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Role of p53 Missense Mutations on Tumorigenesis in VivoR01CA082577 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI LOZANO, GUILLERMINA · 1999 to 2024
$7.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS R01 CA082577
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The majority of TP53 missense mutations identified in cancer patients are in the DNA-binding domain and are characterized as either structural or contact mutations. These missense mutations exhibit inhibitory effects on wild-type p53 activity. More importantly, these mutations also demonstrate gain-of-function (GOF) activities characterized by increased metastasis, poor prognosis, and drug resistance. To better understand the activities by which TP53 mutations, identified in Li-Fraumeni syndrome, contribute to tumorigenesis, we generated mice harboring a novel germline Trp53R245W allele (contact mutation) and compared them with existing models with Trp53R172H (structural mutation) and Trp53R270H (contact mutation) alleles. Thymocytes from heterozygous mice showed that all three hotspot mutations exhibited similar inhibitory effects on wild-type p53 transcription in vivo, and tumors from these mice had similar levels of loss of heterozygosity. However, the overall survival of Trp53R245W/+ and Trp53R270H/+ mice, but not Trp53R172H/+ mice, was significantly shorter than that of Trp53+/- mice, providing strong evidence for p53-mutant-specific GOF contributions to tumor development. Furthermore, Trp53R245W/+ and Trp53R270H/+ mice had more osteosarcoma metastases than Trp53R172H/+ mice, suggesting that these two contact mutants have stronger GOF in driving osteosarcoma metastasis. Transcriptomic analyses using RNA sequencing data from Trp53R172H/+, Trp53R245W/+, and Trp53R270H/+ primary osteosarcomas in comparison with Trp53+/- indicated that GOF of the three mutants was mediated by distinct pathways. Thus, both the inhibitory effect of mutant over wild-type p53 and GOF activities of mutant p53 contributed to tumorigenesis in vivo. Targeting p53 mutant-specific pathways may be important for therapeutic outcomes in osteosarcoma. SIGNIFICANCE: p53 hotspot mutants inhibit wild-type p53 similarly but differ in their GOF activities, with stronger tumor-promoting activity in contact mutants and distinct protein partners of each mutant driving tumorigenesis and metastasis.

Indexed as

Gain of Function MutationOsteosarcomaTumor Suppressor Protein p53AnimalsBone NeoplasmsCarcinogenesisCell Line, TumorCell Transformation, NeoplasticMiceTrp53 protein, mouseTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID35320355
PMCPMC9117479
OpenAlexW4220743839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.