ArticleCancer research2022
Differential Gain-of-Function Activity of Three p53 Hotspot Mutants In Vivo.
Article in Cancer research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Targeting p53 pathways: mechanisms, structures, and advances in therapy.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023Pooled it
- Mutant p53Molecular oncology · 2026Article
- DNA-contact mutant p53 displaces BRCA2 from chromatin and drives R-loop-associated genome instability.Genome biology · 2026Article
- Mice carrying nonsense mutant p53 develop frequent multicentric or metastatic tumors.Cell death & disease · 2025Article
- Parallel Evolution of Leukemic Clones in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms.Research square · 2025Article
- Review
- Article
- The Multifaceted Role of p53 in Cancer Molecular Biology: Insights for Precision Diagnosis and Therapeutic Breakthroughs.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Dependence on Mdm2 for Mdm4 inhibition of p53 activity.Cancer letters · 2025Article
- Restoration of the Tumor Suppressor Function of Y220C-Mutant p53 by Rezatapopt, a Small-Molecule Reactivator.Cancer discovery · 2025Article
- Mutant p53 Gain of Function: Why Many See It, Why Some Do Not.Cancer discovery · 2025Article
- TP53 missense allele predisposing to high risk of breast cancer but not pediatric cancers.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2025Article
- Oncogenic and teratogenic effects ofeLife · 2025Article
- Lipidome atlas of p53 mutant variants in pancreatic cancer.Biology direct · 2025Article
- TP53 mutations in cancer: Molecular features and therapeutic opportunities (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2025Review
- Decoding p53 tumor suppression: a crosstalk between genomic stability and epigenetic control?Cell death and differentiation · 2025Article
- Involvement ofFrontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Are TP53 mutations all alike?Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2024Review
- p53R172H and p53R245W Hotspot Mutations Drive Distinct Transcriptomes in Mouse Mammary Tumors Through a Convergent Transcriptional Mediator.Cancer research communications · 2024Article
- Understanding the complexity of p53 in a new era of tumor suppression.Cancer cell · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The majority of TP53 missense mutations identified in cancer patients are in the DNA-binding domain and are characterized as either structural or contact mutations. These missense mutations exhibit inhibitory effects on wild-type p53 activity. More importantly, these mutations also demonstrate gain-of-function (GOF) activities characterized by increased metastasis, poor prognosis, and drug resistance. To better understand the activities by which TP53 mutations, identified in Li-Fraumeni syndrome, contribute to tumorigenesis, we generated mice harboring a novel germline Trp53R245W allele (contact mutation) and compared them with existing models with Trp53R172H (structural mutation) and Trp53R270H (contact mutation) alleles. Thymocytes from heterozygous mice showed that all three hotspot mutations exhibited similar inhibitory effects on wild-type p53 transcription in vivo, and tumors from these mice had similar levels of loss of heterozygosity. However, the overall survival of Trp53R245W/+ and Trp53R270H/+ mice, but not Trp53R172H/+ mice, was significantly shorter than that of Trp53+/- mice, providing strong evidence for p53-mutant-specific GOF contributions to tumor development. Furthermore, Trp53R245W/+ and Trp53R270H/+ mice had more osteosarcoma metastases than Trp53R172H/+ mice, suggesting that these two contact mutants have stronger GOF in driving osteosarcoma metastasis. Transcriptomic analyses using RNA sequencing data from Trp53R172H/+, Trp53R245W/+, and Trp53R270H/+ primary osteosarcomas in comparison with Trp53+/- indicated that GOF of the three mutants was mediated by distinct pathways. Thus, both the inhibitory effect of mutant over wild-type p53 and GOF activities of mutant p53 contributed to tumorigenesis in vivo. Targeting p53 mutant-specific pathways may be important for therapeutic outcomes in osteosarcoma. SIGNIFICANCE: p53 hotspot mutants inhibit wild-type p53 similarly but differ in their GOF activities, with stronger tumor-promoting activity in contact mutants and distinct protein partners of each mutant driving tumorigenesis and metastasis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.