Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35320315›Full record

ReviewPloS one2022

Development of a national quality framework for palliative care in a mixed generalist and specialist care model: A whole-sector approach and a modified Delphi technique.

Manon S Boddaert, Joep Douma, Anne-Floor Q Dijxhoorn, René A C L Héman, Carin C D van der Rijt, Saskia S C M Teunissen, Peter C Huijgens, Kris C P Vissers

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Manon S BoddaertNetherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2158-8221
Joep DoumaNetherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Anne-Floor Q DijxhoornNetherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands.
René A C L HémanRoyal Dutch Medical Association, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Carin C D van der RijtPalliactief, Dutch Society for Professionals in Palliative Care, Delft, the Netherlands.
Saskia S C M TeunissenNetherlands Association for Palliative Care (PZNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Peter C HuijgensNetherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Kris C P VissersPalliactief, Dutch Society for Professionals in Palliative Care, Delft, the Netherlands.
Leiden University Medical Center · NLNetherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation · NLErasmus MC · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLRoyal Dutch Society for the Promotion of Dentistry · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a predominantly biomedical healthcare model focused on cure, providing optimal, person-centred palliative care is challenging. The general public, patients, and healthcare professionals are often unaware of palliative care's benefits. Poor interdisciplinary teamwork and limited communication combined with a lack of early identification of patients with palliative care needs contribute to sub-optimal palliative care provision. We aimed to develop a national quality framework to improve availability and access to high-quality palliative care in a mixed generalist-specialist palliative care model. We hypothesised that a whole-sector approach and a modified Delphi technique would be suitable to reach this aim. Analogous to the international AGREE guideline criteria and employing a whole-sector approach, an expert panel comprising mandated representatives for patients and their families, various healthcare associations, and health insurers answered the main question: 'What are the elements defining high-quality palliative care in the Netherlands?'. For constructing the quality framework, a bottleneck analysis of palliative care provision and a literature review were conducted. Six core documents were used in a modified Delphi technique to build the framework with the expert panel, while stakeholder organisations were involved and informed in round-table discussions. In the entire process, preparing and building relationships took one year and surveying, convening, discussing content, consulting peers, and obtaining final consent from all stakeholders took 18 months. A quality framework, including a glossary of terms, endorsed by organisations representing patients and their families, general practitioners, elderly care physicians, medical specialists, nurses, social workers, psychologists, spiritual caregivers, and health insurers was developed and annexed with a summary for patients and families. We successfully developed a national consensus-based patient-centred quality framework for high-quality palliative care in a mixed generalist-specialist palliative care model. A whole-sector approach and a modified Delphi technique are feasible structures to achieve this aim. The process we reported may guide other countries in their initiatives to enhance palliative care.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelPalliative CareAgedConsensusDelphi TechniqueHumansQuality of Health Care

Identifiers

PMID35320315
PMCPMC8942240
OpenAlexW4221101036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.