ArticlePLoS computational biology2022
Interactions between sensory prediction error and task error during implicit motor learning.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
52 citing papers in PubMed.
- Haptic interaction with a human partner for ankle training in chronic stroke: a pilot study.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025Trial
- Successful reinforcement history suppresses explicit and implicit error corrections.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Dissociating the behavioral and computational features of implicit motor learning and explicit perturbation detection.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Hypothesis testing governs strategic motor learning.NPJ science of learning · 2026Article
- Perceptual prediction error supports implicit process in motor learning.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Task demands shift motor learning from adaptation to feedback control in a naturalistic bimanual task.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Predictive interception across speed profiles.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2026Article
- Dissociable sensory, motor, and visuomotor predictive functions.NPJ science of learning · 2025Article
- Dynamic Brain Activation and Connectivity in Elite Golfers During Distinct Golf Swing Phases: An fMRI Study.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Uncovering the Role of the Human Hippocampus in Procedural Motor Learning: Insights from Implicit Sensorimotor Adaptation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Involvement of Perimovement Neural Beta-Oscillations in Strategic Aiming for Motor Adaptation.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025Article
- Protection of savings by reducing the salience of opposing errors.NPJ science of learning · 2025Article
- Time Alters Distinct Memories Driven by Sensory Prediction Errors and Task Errors in Sensorimotor Adaptation.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025Article
- Attenuation of implicit motor learning with consecutive exposure to visual errors.IBRO neuroscience reports · 2024Article
- A systematic review of observational practice for adaptation of reaching movements.NPJ science of learning · 2024Article
- Roles and interplay of reinforcement-based and error-based processes during reaching and gait in neurotypical adults and individuals with Parkinson's disease.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Pupillary responses to directional uncertainty while intercepting a moving target.Royal Society open science · 2024Article
- Implicit sensorimotor learning in ballistic movement for transporting an object to a target.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Minimal impact of chronic proprioceptive loss on implicit sensorimotor adaptation and perceived movement outcome.Journal of neurophysiology · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Implicit motor recalibration allows us to flexibly move in novel and changing environments. Conventionally, implicit recalibration is thought to be driven by errors in predicting the sensory outcome of movement (i.e., sensory prediction errors). However, recent studies have shown that implicit recalibration is also influenced by errors in achieving the movement goal (i.e., task errors). Exactly how sensory prediction errors and task errors interact to drive implicit recalibration and, in particular, whether task errors alone might be sufficient to drive implicit recalibration remain unknown. To test this, we induced task errors in the absence of sensory prediction errors by displacing the target mid-movement. We found that task errors alone failed to induce implicit recalibration. In additional experiments, we simultaneously varied the size of sensory prediction errors and task errors. We found that implicit recalibration driven by sensory prediction errors could be continuously modulated by task errors, revealing an unappreciated dependency between these two sources of error. Moreover, implicit recalibration was attenuated when the target was simply flickered in its original location, even though this manipulation did not affect task error - an effect likely attributed to attention being directed away from the feedback cursor. Taken as a whole, the results were accounted for by a computational model in which sensory prediction errors and task errors, modulated by attention, interact to determine the extent of implicit recalibration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.