Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35320090›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on medical imaging2022

Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Brain Hemodynamic Predictions Using Medical Imaging.

Mohammad Sarabian, Hessam Babaee, Kaveh Laksari

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mohammad Sarabian
Hessam Babaee
Kaveh Laksari
University of Arizona · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Enhanced Clinical Diagnosis through Imaging and Modeling: A Machine Learning Data Fusion FrameworkR21EB032187 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BABAEE, HESSAM, LAKSARI, KAVEH · 2021 to 2023
$636k
Noninvasive Real-time Estimation of Cerebral Blood Flow for Personalized Stroke AssessmentR03NS108167 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI BABAEE, HESSAM, LAKSARI, KAVEH · 2019 to 2020
$161k
NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB032187NINDS NIH HHS R03 NS108167
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Determining brain hemodynamics plays a critical role in the diagnosis and treatment of various cerebrovascular diseases. In this work, we put forth a physics-informed deep learning framework that augments sparse clinical measurements with one-dimensional (1D) reduced-order model (ROM) simulations to generate physically consistent brain hemodynamic parameters with high spatiotemporal resolution. Transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasound is one of the most common techniques in the current clinical workflow that enables noninvasive and instantaneous evaluation of blood flow velocity within the cerebral arteries. However, it is spatially limited to only a handful of locations across the cerebrovasculature due to the constrained accessibility through the skull's acoustic windows. Our deep learning framework uses in vivo real-time TCD velocity measurements at several locations in the brain combined with baseline vessel cross-sectional areas acquired from 3D angiography images and provides high-resolution maps of velocity, area, and pressure in the entire brain vasculature. We validate the predictions of our model against in vivo velocity measurements obtained via four-dimensional (4D) flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. We then showcase the clinical significance of this technique in diagnosing cerebral vasospasm (CVS) by successfully predicting the changes in vasospastic local vessel diameters based on corresponding sparse velocity measurements. We show this capability by generating synthetic blood flow data after cerebral vasospasm at various levels of stenosis. Here, we demonstrate that the physics-based deep learning approach can estimate and quantify the subject-specific cerebral hemodynamic variables with high accuracy despite lacking knowledge of inlet and outlet boundary conditions, which is a significant limitation for the accuracy of the conventional purely physics-based computational models.

Indexed as

Vasospasm, IntracranialBlood Flow VelocityBrainCerebrovascular CirculationHemodynamicsHumansNeural Networks, ComputerPhysicsUltrasonography, Doppler, Transcranial

Identifiers

PMID35320090
PMCPMC9437127
OpenAlexW4220937057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.