Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35320019›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2022

Characterization of interlimb interaction via transcutaneous spinal stimulation of cervical and lumbar spinal enlargements.

Darryn A Atkinson, Alexander G Steele, Gerome A Manson, Jony Sheynin, Jeonghoon Oh, Yury P Gerasimenko, Dimitry G Sayenko

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Darryn A AtkinsonDoctor of Physical Therapy program, University of St. Augustine for Health Sciences, Austin, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-1535-2506
Alexander G SteeleDepartment of Neurosurgery, Center for Neuroregeneration, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0001-5007-0638
Gerome A MansonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Center for Neuroregeneration, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas.
Jony SheyninDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Texas A&M University Health Science Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-8463-2317
Jeonghoon OhDepartment of Neurosurgery, Center for Neuroregeneration, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-9185-7362
Yury P GerasimenkoKentucky Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky.ORCID 0000-0002-9345-3791
Dimitry G SayenkoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Center for Neuroregeneration, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas.
Houston Methodist · USTexas A&M Health Science Center · USUniversity of Louisville · US

Funding

Harnessing Neuroplasticity of Postural Sensorimotor Networks Using Non-Invasive Spinal Neuromodulation to Maximize Functional Recovery After Spinal Cord InjuryR01NS119587 · NINDS · METHODIST HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI Dimitry Sayenko · 2022 to 2026
$3.2M
Transformation of Paraplegic Paralysis to Overground Stepping in HumansR01NS102920 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI OVECHKIN, ALEXANDER VLADIMIROVICH · 2019 to 2023
$2.8M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS102920NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS119587
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of transcutaneous electrical spinal stimulation (TSS) to modulate sensorimotor networks after neurological insult has garnered much attention from both researchers and clinicians in recent years. Although many different stimulation paradigms have been reported, the interlimb effects of these neuromodulation techniques have been little studied. The effects of multisite TSS on interlimb sensorimotor function are of particular interest in the context of neurorehabilitation, as these networks have been shown to be important for functional recovery after neurological insult. The present study utilized a condition-test paradigm to investigate the effects of interenlargement TSS on spinal motor excitability in both cervical and lumbosacral motor pools. Additionally, comparison was made between the conditioning effects of lumbosacral and cervical TSS and peripheral stimulation of the fibular nerve and ulnar nerve, respectively. In 16/16 supine, relaxed participants, facilitation of spinally evoked motor responses (sEMRs) in arm muscles was seen in response to lumbosacral TSS or fibular nerve stimulation, whereas facilitation of sEMRs in leg muscles was seen in response to cervical TSS or ulnar nerve stimulation. The decreased latency between TSS- and peripheral nerve-evoked conditioning implicates interlimb networks in the observed facilitation of motor output. The results demonstrate the ability of multisite TSS to engage interlimb networks, resulting in the bidirectional influence of cervical and lumbosacral motor output. The engagement of interlimb networks via TSS of the cervical and lumbosacral enlargements represents a feasible method for engaging spinal sensorimotor networks in clinical populations with compromised motor function.

Indexed as

Spinal Cord InjuriesSpinal Cord StimulationTranscutaneous Electric Nerve StimulationHumansMuscle, SkeletalSpinal Cordhuman neurophysiologyinterlimb reflexespropriospinalspinal cordtranscutaneous spinal stimulation

Identifiers

PMID35320019
PMCPMC8993515
OpenAlexW4220921298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.