Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35319743›Full record

ArticleJAMA psychiatry2022

Neuropsychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes in Patients 6 Months After COVID-19 Requiring Hospitalization Compared With Matched Control Patients Hospitalized for Non-COVID-19 Illness.

Vardan Nersesjan, Lise Fonsmark, Rune H B Christensen, Moshgan Amiri, Charlotte Merie, Anne-Mette Lebech, Terese Katzenstein, Lia E Bang, Jesper Kjærgaard, Daniel Kondziella and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Global prevalence of post-COVID-19 condition: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective evidence.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Cognition and Memory after Covid-19 in a Large Community Sample.The New England journal of medicine · 2024
    Article
  15. Cognitive and mental health trajectories of COVID-19: Role of hospitalisation and long-COVID symptoms.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Effects of COVID-19 on cognition and brain health.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Vardan NersesjanBiological and Precision Psychiatry, Copenhagen Research Center for Mental Health, Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lise FonsmarkDepartment of Intensive Care, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Rune H B ChristensenBiological and Precision Psychiatry, Copenhagen Research Center for Mental Health, Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Moshgan AmiriDepartment of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Charlotte MerieDepartment of Intensive Care, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anne-Mette LebechDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Terese KatzensteinDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lia E BangDepartment of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jesper KjærgaardDepartment of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Daniel KondziellaDepartment of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Michael E BenrosBiological and Precision Psychiatry, Copenhagen Research Center for Mental Health, Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Copenhagen University Hospital · DKRigshospitalet · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Prolonged neuropsychiatric and cognitive symptoms are increasingly reported in patients after COVID-19, but studies with well-matched controls are lacking. Objective: To investigate cognitive impairment, neuropsychiatric diagnoses, and symptoms in survivors of COVID-19 compared with patients hospitalized for non-COVID-19 illness. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective case-control study from a tertiary referral hospital in Copenhagen, Denmark, conducted between July 2020 and July 2021, followed up hospitalized COVID-19 survivors and control patients hospitalized for non-COVID-19 illness, matched for age, sex, and intensive care unit (ICU) status 6 months after symptom onset. Exposures: Hospitalization for COVID-19. Main Outcomes and Measures: Participants were investigated with the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview, the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), neurologic examination, and a semi-structured interview for subjective symptoms. Primary outcomes were total MoCA score and new onset of International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) psychiatric diagnoses. Secondary outcomes included specific psychiatric diagnoses, subjective symptoms, and neurologic examination results. All outcomes were adjusted for age, sex, ICU admission, admission length, and days of follow-up. Secondary outcomes were adjusted for multiple testing. Results: A total of 85 COVID-19 survivors (36 [42%] women; mean [SD] age 56.8 [14] years) after hospitalization and 61 matched control patients with non-COVID-19 illness (27 [44%] women, mean age 59.4 years [SD, 13]) were enrolled. Cognitive status measured by total geometric mean MoCA scores at 6-month follow-up was lower (P = .01) among COVID-19 survivors (26.7; 95% CI, 26.2-27.1) than control patients (27.5; 95% CI, 27.0-27.9). The cognitive status improved substantially (P = .004), from 19.2 (95% CI, 15.2-23.2) at discharge to 26.1 (95% CI, 23.1-29.1) for 15 patients with COVID-19 with MoCA evaluations from hospital discharge. A total of 16 of 85 patients with COVID-19 (19%) and 12 of 61 control patients (20%) had a new-onset psychiatric diagnosis at 6-month follow-up, which was not significantly different (odds ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.39-2.27; P = .87). In fully adjusted models, secondary outcomes were not significantly different, except anosmia, which was more common after COVID-19 (odds ratio, 4.56; 95% CI, 1.52-17.42; P = .006); but no longer when adjusting for multiple testing. Conclusions and Relevance: In this prospective case-control study, cognitive status at 6 months was worse among survivors of COVID-19, but the overall burden of neuropsychiatric and neurologic signs and symptoms among survivors of COVID-19 requiring hospitalization was comparable with the burden observed among matched survivors hospitalized for non-COVID-19 causes.

Indexed as

COVID-19Case-Control StudiesCognitionFemaleHospitalizationHumansInfantIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID35319743
PMCPMC8943626
OpenAlexW4221085316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.