Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35319523›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgery2022

Machine Learning for Predicting Discharge Disposition After Traumatic Brain Injury.

Nihal Satyadev, Pranav I Warman, Andreas Seas, Brad J Kolls, Michael M Haglund, Anthony T Fuller, Timothy W Dunn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Use of artificial intelligence to support prehospital traumatic injury care: A scoping review.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nihal SatyadevDivision of Global Neurosurgery and Neurology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7302-2348
Pranav I WarmanDivision of Global Neurosurgery and Neurology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Andreas SeasDivision of Global Neurosurgery and Neurology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Brad J KollsDivision of Global Neurosurgery and Neurology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Michael M HaglundDivision of Global Neurosurgery and Neurology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Anthony T FullerDivision of Global Neurosurgery and Neurology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Timothy W DunnDivision of Global Neurosurgery and Neurology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007171 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI KONTOS, CHRISTOPHER D · 1985 to 2021
$31.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007171
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent traumatic brain injury (TBI) prognostic calculators are commonly used to predict the mortality and Glasgow Outcome Scale, but these outcomes are most relevant for severe TBI. Because mild and moderate TBI rarely reaches severe outcomes, there is a need for novel prognostic endpoints.

objectiveTo generate machine learning (ML) models with a strong predictive capacity for trichotomized discharge disposition, an outcome not previously used in TBI prognostic models. The outcome can serve as a proxy for patients' functional status, even in mild and moderate patients with TBI.

methodsUsing a large data set (n = 5292) of patients with TBI from a quaternary care center and 84 predictors, including vitals, demographics, mechanism of injury, initial Glasgow Coma Scale, and comorbidities, we trained 6 different ML algorithms using a nested-stratified-cross-validation protocol. After optimizing hyperparameters and performing model selection, isotonic regression was applied to calibrate models.

resultsWhen maximizing the microaveraged area under the receiver operating characteristic curve during hyperparameter optimization, a random forest model exhibited top performance. A random forest model was also selected when maximizing the microaveraged area under the precision-recall curve. For both models, the weighted average area under the receiver operating characteristic curves was 0.84 (95% CI 0.81-0.87) and the weighted average area under the precision-recall curves was 0.85 (95% CI 0.82-0.88).

conclusionOur group presents high-performing ML models to predict trichotomized discharge disposition. These models can assist in optimization of patient triage and treatment, especially in cases of mild and moderate TBI.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticPatient DischargeGlasgow Coma ScaleGlasgow Outcome ScaleHumansMachine LearningPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID35319523
PMCPMC12273637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.