ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2022
A Question-and-Answer System to Extract Data From Free-Text Oncological Pathology Reports (CancerBERT Network): Development Study.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Using natural language processing to analyze unstructured patient-reported outcomes data derived from electronic health records for cancer populations: a systematic review.Expert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research · 2024Pooled it
- Article
- Multilingual Evidence-Based Question-Answering for Stroke Discharge Summaries: Study of Cross-Lingual Heterogeneity in Clinical Reports.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- OncoPT: long-context transformer models for in hospital tumor phenotype extraction from pathology reports.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- The role of artificial intelligence in advancing population-based cancer registration.Science bulletin · 2026Review
- AI assistance in tumor multidisciplinary teams.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence Basics for Head and Neck Pathologists: A Simple Guide.Head and neck pathology · 2026Review
- Large Language Models in Population Oncology: A Contemporary Review on the Use of Large Language Models to Support Data Collection, Aggregation, and Analysis in Cancer Care and Research.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2025Review
- Development and Evaluation of Natural Language Processing Methods for Extracting Key Melanoma Pathology Concepts.Studies in health technology and informatics · 2025Article
- Development and evaluation of large-language models (LLMs) for oncology: A scoping review.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
- Large Language Model Synergy for Ensemble Learning in Medical Question Answering: Design and Evaluation Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Comparative analysis of natural language processing methodologies for classifying computed tomography enterography reports in Crohn's disease patients.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Using Large Language Models to Automate Data Extraction From Surgical Pathology Reports: Retrospective Cohort Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Large Language Model Applications for Health Information Extraction in Oncology: Scoping Review.JMIR cancer · 2025Article
- Article
- Large language models in cancer: potentials, risks, and safeguards.BJR artificial intelligence · 2025Review
- Data, dialogue, and design: patient and public involvement and engagement for natural language processing with real-world cancer data.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
- Leveraging LLM to identify missed information in patient-physician communication: improving healthcare service quality.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Classification of periodontitis stage and grade using natural language processing techniques.PLOS digital health · 2024Article
- Task-Specific Transformer-Based Language Models in Health Care: Scoping Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInformation in pathology reports is critical for cancer care. Natural language processing (NLP) systems used to extract information from pathology reports are often narrow in scope or require extensive tuning. Consequently, there is growing interest in automated deep learning approaches. A powerful new NLP algorithm, bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT), was published in late 2018. BERT set new performance standards on tasks as diverse as question answering, named entity recognition, speech recognition, and more.
objectiveThe aim of this study is to develop a BERT-based system to automatically extract detailed tumor site and histology information from free-text oncological pathology reports.
methodsWe pursued three specific aims: extract accurate tumor site and histology descriptions from free-text pathology reports, accommodate the diverse terminology used to indicate the same pathology, and provide accurate standardized tumor site and histology codes for use by downstream applications. We first trained a base language model to comprehend the technical language in pathology reports. This involved unsupervised learning on a training corpus of 275,605 electronic pathology reports from 164,531 unique patients that included 121 million words. Next, we trained a question-and-answer (Q&A) model that connects a Q&A layer to the base pathology language model to answer pathology questions. Our Q&A system was designed to search for the answers to two predefined questions in each pathology report: What organ contains the tumor? and What is the kind of tumor or carcinoma? This involved supervised training on 8197 pathology reports, each with ground truth answers to these 2 questions determined by certified tumor registrars. The data set included 214 tumor sites and 193 histologies. The tumor site and histology phrases extracted by the Q&A model were used to predict International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, Third Edition (ICD-O-3), site and histology codes. This involved fine-tuning two additional BERT models: one to predict site codes and another to predict histology codes. Our final system includes a network of 3 BERT-based models. We call this CancerBERT network (caBERTnet). We evaluated caBERTnet using a sequestered test data set of 2050 pathology reports with ground truth answers determined by certified tumor registrars.
resultscaBERTnet's accuracies for predicting group-level site and histology codes were 93.53% (1895/2026) and 97.6% (1993/2042), respectively. The top 5 accuracies for predicting fine-grained ICD-O-3 site and histology codes with 5 or more samples each in the training data set were 92.95% (1794/1930) and 96.01% (1853/1930), respectively.
conclusionsWe have developed an NLP system that outperforms existing algorithms at predicting ICD-O-3 codes across an extensive range of tumor sites and histologies. Our new system could help reduce treatment delays, increase enrollment in clinical trials of new therapies, and improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.