Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35319130›Full record

ReviewClinical endocrinology2022

Update on the clinical management of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1.

Carolina R C Pieterman, Gerlof D Valk

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical endocrinology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Pathogenic mobile element insertion in theJournal of medical genetics · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Differential diagnosis and predictive markers of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (PanNET).Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors in Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia.Endocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea) · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Neuroendocrine Tumors: Germline Genetics and Hereditary Syndromes.Current treatment options in oncology · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Phenotypic presentation ofOxford medical case reports · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Carolina R C PietermanDepartment of Endocrine Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4894-373X
Gerlof D ValkDepartment of Endocrine Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review provides an overview of novel insights in the clinical management of patients with Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1, focusing on the last decade since the last update of the MEN1 guidelines. With regard to Diagnosis: Mutation-negative patients with 2/3 main manifestations have a different clinical course compared to mutation-positive patients. As for primary hyperparathyroidism: subtotal parathyroidectomy is the initial procedure of choice. Current debate centres around the timing of initial parathyroidectomy as well as the controversial topic of unilateral clearance in young patients. For duodenopancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (NETs), the main challenge is accurate and individualized risk stratification to enable personalized surveillance and treatment. Thymus NETs remain one of the most aggressive MEN1-related tumours. Lung NETs are more frequent than previously thought, generally indolent, but rare aggressive cases do occur. Pituitary adenomas are most often prolactinomas and nonfunctioning microadenomas with an excellent prognosis and good response to therapy. Breast cancer is recognized as part of the MEN1 syndrome in women and periodical screening is advised. Clinically relevant manifestations are already seen at the paediatric age and initiating screening in the second decade is advisable. MEN1 has a significant impact on quality of life and US data show a significant financial burden. In conclusion, patient outcomes have improved, but much is still to be achieved. For care tailored to the needs of the individual patient and improving outcomes on an individual basis, studies are now needed to define predictors of tumour behaviour and effects of more individualized interventions.

Indexed as

Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1Neuroendocrine TumorsPancreatic NeoplasmsPituitary NeoplasmsChildFemaleHumansQuality of Lifedisease managementgenetic testingmultiple endocrine neoplasia type 1neuroendocrine tumourspituitary neoplasmsprimary hyperparathyroidismreview

Identifiers

PMID35319130
PMCPMC9540817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.