ArticleBiotechnology and bioengineering2022
Optimization of VSV-ΔG-spike production process with the Ambr15 system for a SARS-COV-2 vaccine.
Article in Biotechnology and bioengineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development of a Cellular Membrane Nanovesicle-Based Vaccine Against Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus.Cells · 2026Article
- Perfusion process with tangential flow filtration for oncolytic VSV-GP production.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- From single-cell cloning to high-yield influenza virus production - implementing advanced technologies in vaccine process development.Engineering in life sciences · 2024Article
- High-titer manufacturing of SARS-CoV-2 Spike-pseudotyped VSV in stirred-tank bioreactors.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2024Article
- Enhanced production yields of rVSV-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine using Fibra-CelFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Review
- Optimization of VSV-ΔG-spike production process with the Ambr15 system for a SARS-COV-2 vaccine.Biotechnology and bioengineering · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To face the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus, our institute has developed the rVSV-ΔG-spike vaccine, in which the glycoprotein of vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) was replaced by the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2. Many process parameters can influence production yield. To maximize virus vaccine yield, each parameter should be tested independently and in combination with others. Here, we report the optimization of the production of the VSV-ΔG-spike vaccine in Vero cells using the Ambr15 system. This system facilitates high-throughput screening of process parameters, as it contains 24 individually controlled, single-use stirred-tank minireactors. During optimization, critical parameters were tested. Those parameters included: cell densities; the multiplicity of infection; virus production temperature; medium addition and medium exchange; and supplementation of glucose in the virus production step. Virus production temperature, medium addition, and medium exchange were all found to significantly influence the yield. The optimized parameters were tested in the BioBLU 5p bioreactors production process and those that were found to contribute to the vaccine yield were integrated into the final process. The findings of this study demonstrate that an Ambr15 system is an effective tool for bioprocess optimization of vaccine production using macrocarriers and that the combination of production temperature, rate of medium addition, and medium exchange significantly improved virus yield.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.