Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35318966›Full record

ArticleJournal of biosciences2022

A preference for link operator functions can drive Boolean biological networks towards critical dynamics.

Ajay Subbaroyan, Olivier C Martin, Areejit Samal

Abstract read
PubMed
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biosciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ajay SubbaroyanThe Institute of Mathematical Sciences (IMSc), Chennai 600113, India.
Olivier C Martin
Areejit Samal

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Boolean modelling is a powerful framework to understand the operating principles of biological networks. The regulatory logic between biological entities in these networks is expressed as Boolean functions (BFs). There exist various types of BFs (and thus regulatory logic rules) which are meaningful in the biological context. In this contribution, we explore one such type, known as link operator functions (LOFs). We theoretically enumerate these functions and show that, among all BFs and even within the biologically consistent effective and unate functions (EUFs), the LOFs form a tiny subset. We then find that the AND-NOT LOFs are particularly abundant in reconstructed biological Boolean networks. By leveraging these facts, namely, the tiny representation of LOFs in the space of EUFs and their presence in the biological dataset, we show that the space of acceptable models can be shrunk by applying steady-state constraints to BFs, followed by the choice of LOFs which satisfy those constraints. Finally, we demonstrate that among a wide range of BFs, the LOFs drive biological network dynamics towards criticality.

Identifiers

PMID35318966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.