Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35318623›Full record

ArticleGesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany))2022

[Experiences of Stigmatization Among Professional Caregivers in the Context of Covid-19 - a Qualitative Study].

Gudrun Faller, Maria Zeiser, Laura Geiger, Martin Schieron, Noemi Skarabis, Lea Scheuvens, Melanie Schubert, Marlen Melzer, Uta Wegewitz, Andreas Seidler and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. [Workload and mental health of nursing staff in Germany during the COVID-19 pandemic-a scoping review].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Gudrun Faller *Department of Community Health, Hochschule für Gesundheit Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Maria Zeiser *Institut und Poliklinik für Arbeits- und Sozialmedizin, Medizinische Fakultät Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Laura GeigerDepartment of Community Health, Hochschule für Gesundheit Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Martin SchieronDepartment of Community Health, Hochschule für Gesundheit Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Noemi SkarabisDepartment of Community Health, Hochschule für Gesundheit Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Lea ScheuvensInstitut und Poliklinik für Arbeits- und Sozialmedizin, Medizinische Fakultät Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Melanie SchubertInstitut und Poliklinik für Arbeits- und Sozialmedizin, Medizinische Fakultät Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Marlen MelzerBundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin Gruppe 3.3, Arbeitsgestaltung bei personenbezogenen Dienstleistungen, Dresden, Germany.
Uta WegewitzBundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin Gruppe 3.5, Evidenzbasierte Arbeitsmedizin, Betriebliches Gesundheitsmanagement, Berlin, Germany.
Andreas SeidlerInstitut und Poliklinik für Arbeits- und Sozialmedizin, Medizinische Fakultät Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8107-8971
Maria GirbigInstitut und Poliklinik für Arbeits- und Sozialmedizin, Medizinische Fakultät Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveHealthcare workers seem to be more affected by stigma due to the Covid-19 pandemic compared to other occupational groups. However, there is very little research on this topic. The aims of the present study were to investigate pandemic-related stigmatization experiences among nursing and medical staff in Germany and determine the type and effects of stigmatization as well as appropriate prevention and intervention measures.

methodsThe interviews were conducted by a semi-structured interview guide and evaluated using qualitative content analysis.

resultsSixteen nurses participated in the interviews. Sources of stigmatization were friends and acquaintances, family members, executives, colleagues, patients and their relatives, strangers and public media. Some of the interviewed persons reported self-stigmatization. A common cause of stigma in the private environment was the fear of infection. In the context of the work, illness-related absence was also named as one of the causes of stigma. The interviewees reported about distancing and avoiding contact, as well as allegations they were faced with. As a result, they suffered from negative feelings and partially from psychosomatic complaints. Some interviewees tried to avoid stigmatization by concealing their own profession or place of work. Help was offered in private and professional context in form of conversations and encouragement.

conclusionStigmatization of healthcare professionals during the pandemic has hardly been explored in Germany. There is a particular need for research to quantify the extent, manifestations and effects of work-related stigmatization and to develop suitable preventive measures at workplace and outside of work.

Indexed as

COVID-19CaregiversGermanyHumansPandemicsQualitative ResearchStereotyping

Identifiers

PMID35318623
PMCPMC11248541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.