ArticleThe European physical journal. E, Soft matter2022
Effect of varying load in moving period of a step on dynamics of molecular motors.
Article in The European physical journal. E, Soft matter, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modeling Studies of the Mechanism of Context-Dependent Bidirectional Movements of Kinesin-14 Motors.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A Model for Chemomechanical Coupling of Kinesin-3 Motor.Cellular and molecular bioengineering · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During the processive stepping of a molecular motor on its polar track, a step consists of a long dwell period and a very short moving period. In single molecule optical trapping experiments to determine the load dependence of the motor dynamics, although the motor experiences a constant load during the dwell period, it experiences a varying load during the moving period. However, in previous theoretical studies to explain the single molecule optical trapping data, it was simply assumed that the motor experiences a constant load during both the dwell period and the following moving period. Thus, an important but unclear issue is whether the assumption is appropriate in the theoretical studies. Here, we take kinesin and myosin-V as examples to study theoretically the motor dynamics with the consideration of the varying load during the moving period and compare with that with the assumption of the constant load. The studies show that in the optical trapping experiments employed in the literature, for the kinesin with a small step size of about 8 nm it is a good approximation to make the theoretical studies by assuming that the motor experiences the constant load during the moving period. For the myosin-V with a large step size of about 36 nm, there are small but noticeable deviations of the results obtained by considering that the motor experiences the varying load during the moving period from those by assuming that the motor experiences the constant load. .
Indexed as
Identifiers
35318549What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.