Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35318542›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2022

Prosthetic joint infection diagnosis applying the three-level European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) approach.

Chiara Papalini, Giacomo Pucci, Giulia Cenci, Antonella Mencacci, Daniela Francisci, Auro Caraffa, Pierluigi Antinolfi, Maria Bruna Pasticci

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Could it beThe Journal of international medical research · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chiara PapaliniInfectious Diseases Clinic, Department of Medicine, University of Perugia, Santa Maria Della Misericordia Hospital, 06100, Perugia, Italy. chiara.papalini@ospedale.perugia.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5427-8011
Giacomo PucciInternal Medicine, University of Perugia, Santa Maria Hospital, Terni, Italy.
Giulia CenciOrthopedic Clinic, University of Perugia, Santa Maria Della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia, Italy.
Antonella MencacciMicrobiology Laboratory, University of Perugia, Santa Maria Della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia, Italy.
Daniela FrancisciInfectious Diseases Clinic, Department of Medicine, University of Perugia, Santa Maria Della Misericordia Hospital, 06100, Perugia, Italy.
Auro CaraffaOrthopedic Clinic, University of Perugia, Santa Maria Della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia, Italy.
Pierluigi AntinolfiOrthopedic Clinic, University of Perugia, Santa Maria Della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia, Italy.
Maria Bruna PasticciInfectious Diseases Clinic, University of Perugia, Santa Maria Hospital, Terni, Italy. mariabruna.pasticci@unipg.it.
University of Perugia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensitive and specific tests for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) are lacking. The aim of this study was to report clinical and microbiological findings of consecutive patients diagnosed with PJI at the University Hospital of Perugia, Perugia, Italy, and to validate these diagnoses utilizing the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) three-level diagnostic approach from 2021. Patients with a PJI diagnosis were included in this study and examined retrospectively. Overall, 133 patients were diagnosed with PJI: mean age 72 years, 54.9% female, and 55.6% with more than one comorbidity. The most frequent involved joints were hip 47% and knee 42%. Aetiology was identified in 88/133 (66.2%): staphylococci resulted the most frequent microorganisms and over 80% (45/54) resulted rifampin susceptible. Applying the EBJIS approach, PJI diagnosis resulted: confirmed in 101 (75.9%), likely in 25 (18.8%), and unlikely in 7 (5.3%). Likely PJIs aetiology was Staphylococcus aureus 11/25, coagulase-negative staphylococci 8/25, Streptococcus agalactiae 3/25, viridans group streptococci 2/25, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa 1/25. No statistically significant differences were detected among the three diagnosis groups with regard to clinical characteristics with the exception of a higher number of confirmed PJIs occurring < 3 months after implantation. The logistic regression analysis did not disclose any independent predictor of confirmed PJIs. We recommend using all the diagnostic tests available to approach PJI diagnosis, and suggest caution before rejecting PJI diagnosis in the presence of highly virulent microorganisms from a single sample, in patients without sinus tract, and in those receiving antimicrobial at the time microbiologic samples are collected. Study approved by Umbrian Regional Ethical Committee, Perugia, Italy, Prot. N. 23,124/21/ON of 10.27.2021.

Indexed as

Arthritis, InfectiousArthroplasty, Replacement, HipProsthesis-Related InfectionsStaphylococcal InfectionsAgedFemaleHumansKnee JointMaleRetrospective StudiesClinicalDiagnosis algorithmEBJISMicrobiologyProsthetic joint infection

Identifiers

PMID35318542
PMCPMC9033695
OpenAlexW4221022024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.