Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35318524›Full record

ArticleApplied microbiology and biotechnology2022

Gut Bifidobacterium responses to probiotic Lactobacillus casei Zhang administration vary between subjects from different geographic regions.

Feiyan Zhao, Xiaoye Bai, Juntao Zhang, Lai-Yu Kwok, Lingling Shen, Hao Jin, Tiansong Sun, Zhihong Sun, Heping Zhang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Frontiers in immunology · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Feiyan Zhao *Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Key Laboratory of Dairy Products Processing, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Key Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Ministry of Education, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Inner Mongolia, 010018, Hohhot, China.
Xiaoye Bai *Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Key Laboratory of Dairy Products Processing, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Key Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Ministry of Education, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Inner Mongolia, 010018, Hohhot, China.
Juntao Zhang *Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Key Laboratory of Dairy Products Processing, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Key Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Ministry of Education, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Inner Mongolia, 010018, Hohhot, China.
Lai-Yu KwokInner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Key Laboratory of Dairy Products Processing, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Key Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Ministry of Education, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Inner Mongolia, 010018, Hohhot, China.
Lingling ShenInner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Key Laboratory of Dairy Products Processing, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Key Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Ministry of Education, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Inner Mongolia, 010018, Hohhot, China.
Hao JinInner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Key Laboratory of Dairy Products Processing, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Key Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Ministry of Education, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Inner Mongolia, 010018, Hohhot, China.
Tiansong SunInner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Key Laboratory of Dairy Products Processing, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Key Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Ministry of Education, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Inner Mongolia, 010018, Hohhot, China.
Zhihong SunInner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Key Laboratory of Dairy Products Processing, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Key Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Ministry of Education, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Inner Mongolia, 010018, Hohhot, China.
Heping ZhangInner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Key Laboratory of Dairy Products Processing, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Key Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Ministry of Education, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Inner Mongolia, 010018, Hohhot, China. hepingdd@vip.sina.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4140-7486

Funding

National Key R&D Program of China 2018YFE0123500National Natural Science Foundation of China 31720103911the Science and Technology Major Projects of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region 2021ZD0014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bifidobacteria are health-promoting human gut inhabitants, but accurate species-level composition of the gut bifidobacteria and their responses to probiotic intervention have not been fully explored. This was a follow-up work of our previous study, in which 104 volunteers from six different Asiatic regions (Singapore, Indonesia, Xinjiang, Gansu, Inner Mongolia, Mongolia) were recruited. The gut microbiota and their responses towards Lactobacillus casei Zhang (LCZ) intervention were characterized (at days 0, 7, and 14; 14 days after stopping probiotic intake), and region-based differential responses were observed after LCZ intervention. This study further investigated changes in the species-level gut bifidobacteria by PacBio small-molecule real-time sequencing (SMRT) using bifidobacteria-specific primers. Firstly, this study found that Bifidobacterium adolescentis (42.58%) and Bifidobacterium breve (26.34%) were the core species across the six Asiatic regions. Secondly, principal coordinate analysis of probiotic-induced changes in the gut bifidobacterial microbiota (represented by weighted UniFrac distances) grouped the six regions into two clusters, namely northern (Xinjiang, Gansu, Inner Mongolia, and Mongolia) and southern (Singapore, Indonesia) regions. Thirdly, LCZ intervention induced region-based differential responses of gut bifidobacterial microbiota. The relative abundance of Bifidobacterium animalis in subjects from northern but not southern region substantially increased after LCZ intervention. Moreover, LCZ intervention significantly increased the weighted UniFrac distances in the southern but not northern subjects 7 days after LCZ intervention. The gut B. adolescentis correlated significantly and negatively with the weighted UniFrac distances of the baseline gut bifidobacterial microbiota in subjects of northern but not southern region, suggesting a possible homeostatic effect of LCZ on the gut bifidobacterial population of northern but not southern subjects. Collectively, our study found that probiotic-induced responses of the gut bifidobacterial microbiota varied with subjects' geographic origins, and B. adolescentis might play a role in maintaining the overall stability of the gut bifidobacterial population. KEY POINTS: • The core species in the six Asiatic regions are Bifidobacterium adolescentis and Bifidobacterium breve. • The gut bifidobacterial microbiota in people from various geographic origins showed different responses on probiotic administration.

Indexed as

Bifidobacterium adolescentisGastrointestinal MicrobiomeLacticaseibacillus caseiProbioticsBifidobacteriumFecesHumansSequence Analysis, DNAAsian regionsBifidobacteriumGut microbiotaLactobacillus casei Zhang

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.