Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35318507›Full record

ArticleUrologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2022

[Are there benefits for catheter valves for catheter-associated quality of life? : Results of an investigation in 427 catheter wearers with life-long indication].

Andreas Wiedemann, A Mourad, C Gedding, J Stein, A Manseck, R Kirschner-Hermanns, T Liebald, C Linné, A Schorn, A Wagner and 8 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Andreas WiedemannUrologische Abteilung, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Witten gGmbH, Pferdebachstr. 27, 58455, Witten, Deutschland. awiedemann@evk-witten.de.
A MouradUrologische Abteilung, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Witten gGmbH, Pferdebachstr. 27, 58455, Witten, Deutschland.
C GeddingUrologische Abteilung, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Witten gGmbH, Pferdebachstr. 27, 58455, Witten, Deutschland.
J SteinUrologische Abteilung, Klinikum Großburgwedel, Großburgwedel, Deutschland.
A ManseckUrologische Abteilung, Klinikum Ingolstadt GmbH, Ingolstadt, Deutschland.
R Kirschner-HermannsNeuro-Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Bonn, Deutschland.
T LiebaldPraxis für Urologie, Dresden, Deutschland.
C LinnéPraxis für Urologie, Dresden, Deutschland.
A SchornPraxis für Urologie, Saarburg, Deutschland.
A WagnerPraxis für Urologie, Limburgerhof, Deutschland.
V MollPraxis für Urologie, Augsburg, Deutschland.
U UngerPraxis für Urologie, Oelsnitz, Deutschland.
A EisenhardtPraxis für Urologie, Mülheim a. d. Ruhr, Deutschland.
J SalemCuros urologisches Zentrum Köln, Abteilung für Urologie, Klinik Links vom Rhein, Köln, Deutschland.
A BannowskyKlinik für Urologie, Imland-Klinik Rendsburg, Rendsburg, Deutschland.
S WirzAbteilung für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin, Schmerz und Palliativmedizin, Zentrum für Schmerzmedizin, Weaningzentrum, GFO-Kliniken Bonn/Cura Bad Honnef, Bonn, Deutschland.
E BrammenInstitut für Statistik, Chrestos Concept GmbH & Co. KG, Essen, Deutschland.
H-J HeppnerLehrstuhl für Geriatrie, Universität Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Deutschland.
Orthopädische Praxis · DEWitten/Herdecke University · DEEvangelisches Krankenhaus Oldenburg · DEInstitut für Angewandte Statistik · DEInstitut für Berufliche Aus- und Fortbildung · DEKlinikum Ingolstadt · DELandesarchiv · DESt. Marien-Hospital Bonn · DEUniversity Hospital Bonn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn urology, a subset of patients with lifelong urine drainage are fitted with a catheter valve. Data on catheter-related quality of life (crqol) in this subset of patients are missing.

aimClarification of the whether there are advantages for valve-aided catheters in comparison with continuous urine drainage in catheter wearers with a lifelong indication.

methodsIn all, 357 patients with a catheter with lifelong indication of continuous urine drainage from a previous study were compared with 70 valve-aided patients. The crqol was evaluated by a validated assessment with 25 items and five domains.

resultsThere were statistically more patients with a suprapubic catheter than with a transurethral indwelling catheter (73.4 vs. 54.4%, p = 0.005), significantly more patients with bladder voiding dysfunction (73.5 vs. 52.6%, p = 0.003) and significantly more patients with small catheter sizes (p = 0.001). Crqol was altogether slightly impaired with a median score of 4.2 (no impairment indicated by 5 points) in valve-aided patients, but crqol was more impaired in valve-aided patients compared to patients with continuous drainage (4.4 points, n. s.). Some items demonstrated more problems dealing with urinary urge in valve-aided patients, but catheter-related pain was more often worse in patients with continuous drainage.

conclusionThere is no clear evidence for an advantage of a catheter valve over a continuous urine drainage system. Thus, the decision regarding a catheter-valve system must be made individually according to the indication and the preferences of the patient.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeUrinary CatheterizationCatheters, IndwellingDrainageHumansUrinary BladderFoley catheterGeriatric patientsQuality of lifeSuprapubic catheterUrinary catheter

Identifiers

PMID35318507
OpenAlexW4220996044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.