ArticleHNO2022
[Eustachian tube dysfunction after cleft palate surgery : Use of the latest diagnostics].
Article in HNO, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveIn patients with cleft palate, a high incidence of chronic obstructive Eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD) is assumed after surgery. Consequently, an increased rate of retracted eardrum or cholesteatoma is expected. Even though no common standard for investigating ETD is available, the development of objective tests has increased during the past 10 years. This study aimed to investigate the incidence of persisting chronic obstructive ETD in adult patients with cleft palate surgically treated in early childhood by using a combination of diagnostic tools.
methodsAdult participants with cleft palate repair in early childhood were invited for a follow-up examination and compared to a control group. Examination included tympanometry, tubomanometry, the Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire (ETDQ-7), and the Eustachian Tube Score 7 (ETS-7).
resultsA total of 16 adult patients were re-examined after cleft palate surgery and compared to a control group of 40 healthy individuals. Significant differences were found in the median ETS‑7 (p < 0.0001) score but not in the median ETDQ‑7 (p = 0.09) score. Only 2 of the 32 investigated ears (6%) had pathologic scores in ETS‑7 and ETDQ‑7 (p = 0.09), whereas 5 (31%) cleft palate patients showed symptoms of chronic obstructive ETD according to ETS‑7. No patient had examination findings indicating a requirement for further treatment.
conclusionBy combining diagnostic tools for ETD, a lower rate of persisting obstructive ETD in adults after cleft palate surgery was found than previously reported. Successful surgical treatment of cleft palate seems to lead to physiological Eustachian tube function in long-term follow up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.