Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35318488›Full record

SynthesisAdvances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology2022

Environmental Impacts of Biosurfactants from a Life Cycle Perspective: A Systematic Literature Review.

Ann-Kathrin Briem, Lars Bippus, Amira Oraby, Philipp Noll, Susanne Zibek, Stefan Albrecht

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ann-Kathrin BriemDepartment of Life Cycle Engineering GaBi, Institute for Acoustics and Building Physics IABP, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany. ann-kathrin.briem@iabp.uni-stuttgart.de.
Lars BippusDepartment of Life Cycle Engineering GaBi, Institute for Acoustics and Building Physics IABP, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
Amira OrabyDepartment of Industrial Biotechnology, Fraunhofer Institute for Interfacial Engineering and Biotechnology IGB, Stuttgart, Germany.
Philipp NollDepartment of Bioprocess Engineering (150k), Institute of Food Science and Biotechnology, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany.
Susanne ZibekDepartment of Industrial Biotechnology, Fraunhofer Institute for Interfacial Engineering and Biotechnology IGB, Stuttgart, Germany.
Stefan AlbrechtDepartment of Life Cycle Engineering GaBi, Fraunhofer Institute for Building Physics IBP, Stuttgart, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biosurfactants are considered as an environmentally friendly and sustainable alternative to conventional fossil-derived and chemically produced surfactants. Their production pathways, physicochemical properties, and applications are widely researched and discussed in literature. In this context, investigating the different impacts from the entire life cycle of biosurfactants is important to understand and mitigate potential environmental hotspots. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is an internationally accepted and standardized methodology to analyze the environmental impacts of products from a holistic view. Therefore, this study provides a detailed overview of existing LCA studies of biosurfactants by means of a systematic literature research. The focus specifically lies on articles that investigated microbial biosurfactants. However, the systematic approach used ensured a broader overview related to bio-based surfactants as well. Furthermore, two related topics, ecotoxicity and biodegradability of biosurfactants, were identified and discussed based on the search findings. After screening over 2,500 documents using Scopus and Google Scholar, six relevant LCA articles of biosurfactants could be identified. The identified articles are divided into LCA studies of alkyl polyglycosides, chemically produced bio-based surfactants, and LCA studies of microbial biosurfactants, their content analyzed and discussed in context. In conclusion, the number of available LCA studies is very limited and their results are often not comparable. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this review is the first of its kind to provide a detailed overview of LCA studies of biosurfactants. Consequently, the need for implementing more LCA studies becomes clear.

Indexed as

EnvironmentSurface-Active AgentsAnimalsLife Cycle StagesSurface-Active AgentsAlkyl polyglycosideBio-basedBiodegradabilityBioeconomyBiosurfactantEcotoxicityEnvironmentally friendlyLCALife cycle assessmentMicrobial surfactantRenewable resourcesRhamnolipidScreeningSophorolipidSustainabilitySystematic literature research

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.