Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35318409›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Genome wide study of cysteine rich receptor like proteins in Gossypium sp.

Athar Hussain, Naila Asif, Abdul Rafay Pirzada, Azka Noureen, Javeria Shaukat, Akif Burhan, Madiha Zaynab, Ejaz Ali, Koukab Imran, Ayesha Ameen and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review of protein structure-based analyses that illuminate plant stress mechanisms.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Athar HussainGenomics Lab, School of Food and Agricultural Sciences (SFAS), University of Management and Technology (UMT), Lahore, 54000, Pakistan. atharmutahari@gmail.com.
Naila AsifDepartment of Life Sciences, School of Science, University of Management and Technology (UMT), Lahore, 54000, Pakistan.
Abdul Rafay PirzadaDepartment of Life Sciences, School of Science, University of Management and Technology (UMT), Lahore, 54000, Pakistan.
Azka NoureenNational Institute for Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering (NIBGE), College of Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences (PIEAS), Faisalabad, 38000, Pakistan.
Javeria ShaukatDepartment of Life Sciences, School of Science, University of Management and Technology (UMT), Lahore, 54000, Pakistan.
Akif BurhanDepartment of Life Sciences, School of Science, University of Management and Technology (UMT), Lahore, 54000, Pakistan.
Madiha ZaynabShenzhen Key Laboratory of Marine Bioresource & Eco-Environmental Sciences, College of Life Sciences and Oceanography, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 51807, China.
Ejaz AliCenter of Excellence in Molecular Biology, University of Punjab, Lahore, 54000, Pakistan.
Koukab ImranDepartment of Life Sciences, School of Science, University of Management and Technology (UMT), Lahore, 54000, Pakistan.
Ayesha AmeenOffice of Research Innovation and Commercialization, University of Management and Technology (UMT), Lahore, 54000, Pakistan.
Muhammad Arslan MahmoodNational Institute for Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering (NIBGE), College of Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences (PIEAS), Faisalabad, 38000, Pakistan.
Aquib NazarDepartment of Life Sciences, School of Science, University of Management and Technology (UMT), Lahore, 54000, Pakistan.
M Shahid MukhtarDepartment of Biology, the University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1300 University Blvd., Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cysteine-rich receptor-like-kinases (CRKs), a transmembrane subfamily of receptor-like kinase, play crucial roles in plant adaptation. As such cotton is the major source of fiber for the textile industry, but environmental stresses are limiting its growth and production. Here, we have performed a deep computational analysis of CRKs in five Gossypium species, including G. arboreum (60 genes), G. raimondii (74 genes), G. herbaceum (65 genes), G. hirsutum (118 genes), and G. barbadense (120 genes). All identified CRKs were classified into 11 major classes and 43 subclasses with the finding of several novel CRK-associated domains including ALMT, FUSC_2, Cript, FYVE, and Pkinase. Of these, DUF26_DUF26_Pkinase_Tyr was common and had elevated expression under different biotic and abiotic stresses. Moreover, the 35 land plants comparison identified several new CRKs domain-architectures. Likewise, several SNPs and InDels were observed in CLCuD resistant G. hirsutum. The miRNA target side prediction and their expression profiling in different tissues predicted miR172 as a major CRK regulating miR. The expression profiling of CRKs identified multiple clusters with co-expression under certain stress conditions. The expression analysis under CLCuD highlighted the role of GhCRK057, GhCRK059, GhCRK058, and GhCRK081 in resistant accession. Overall, these results provided primary data for future potential functional analysis as well as a reference study for other agronomically important crops.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyGossypiumCysteineGene Expression Regulation, PlantGenome, PlantMultigene FamilyPhylogenyPlant ProteinsCysteinePlant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID35318409
PMCPMC8941122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.