Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35318378›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

The comparison of cytotoxic and genotoxic activities of glucosinolates, isothiocyanates, and indoles.

Dominik Kołodziejski, Izabela Koss-Mikołajczyk, Hansruedi Glatt, Agnieszka Bartoszek

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Glucosinolate Derivatives: Emerging Anti-Inflammatory Agents.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  4. Comparative Studies of Extracts Obtained fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Dominik KołodziejskiDepartment of Food Chemistry, Technology and Biotechnology, Gdansk University of Technology, Narutowicza St. 11/12, 80-233, Gdansk, Poland.
Izabela Koss-MikołajczykDepartment of Food Chemistry, Technology and Biotechnology, Gdansk University of Technology, Narutowicza St. 11/12, 80-233, Gdansk, Poland. izabela.koss-mikolajczyk@pg.edu.pl.
Hansruedi GlattDepartment of Nutritional Toxicology, German Institute of Human Nutrition, Potsdam-Rehbrücke, 14558, Nuthetal, Germany.
Agnieszka BartoszekDepartment of Food Chemistry, Technology and Biotechnology, Gdansk University of Technology, Narutowicza St. 11/12, 80-233, Gdansk, Poland.
Gdańsk University of Technology · PLGerman Institute of Human Nutrition · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemopreventive properties of Brassica vegetables are attributed mainly to their characteristic compounds-glucosinolates (GLs) and their main hydrolysis products-isothiocyanates (ITCs) and indoles. In this study, we compared antiproliferative activity (MTT test in HT29 cells) and genotoxic effects (comet assay in HT29 cells and restriction analysis in a cell-free system) of three GLs (sinigrin (SIN), glucotropaeolin (GTL), and glucobrassicin (GLB)) with that of their major degradation products. Intact GLs did not exhibit cytotoxic activity, possibly due to their limited bioavailability. However, in the presence of myrosinase (MYR), GLs gained the ability to inhibit HT29 cells' growth. The addition of MYR caused the hydrolysis of GLs to the corresponding ITCs or indoles, i.e. compounds that show stronger biological activity than parent GLs. Pure ITC/indole solutions showed the strongest antiproliferative activity. Based on the results of restriction analysis, it was found that GLs to a greater extent than ITCs caused DNA modification in a cell-free system. In the case of GLs, metabolic activation by the S9 fraction increased this effect, and at the same time changed the preferential binding site from the area of base pairs AT to GC base pairs. Of all compounds tested, only benzyl ITC caused DNA damage detectable in the comet assay, but it required relatively high concentrations.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBrassicaDNA DamageGlucosinolatesHumansIndolesIsothiocyanatesAntineoplastic AgentsGlucosinolatesIndolesIsothiocyanates

Identifiers

PMID35318378
PMCPMC8940953
OpenAlexW4221102972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.